Power Point Presentation

December 22, 2022

Power Point Presentation

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Power Point Presentation

[Order Now]

For your final paper and presentation you are being asked to follow up on the comparison you did in the midterm of the two cities based on health outcomes and social and economic factors. From what you have been learning so far, there has been a case established linking health status to socioeconomic determinates, demographics and other factors in explaining the disparities in health outcome.

For your assigned cities, do the following:

Visit the 500 Cities Website:–Chose Compare cities, chose the two cities to compare by and chose the following:https://www.cdc.gov/500cities (Links to an external site.)
(Links to an external site.)
- Health Outcome: Asthma, COPD, Diabetes, High Blood Pressure, Physical Health, Mental Health and Teeth lost.
- Prevention: Health Insurance, Annual Checkup, Dental Visits, Taking BP medication, Core preventative services for men and Core preventative services for women.
- Unhealthy Behavior: All five measures.
After which, Visit City Health Dashboard–Chose the two cities you are comparing: (Links to an external site.)
(Links to an external site.)
https (Links to an external site.)
(Links to an external site.)
(Links to an external site.)
(Links to an external site.)
://www.cityhealthdashboard.com (Links to an external site.)
(Links to an external site.)
- Compare these health outcomes: Obesity and Premature Deaths
- Social and economic factors: Children in Poverty, High School graduation, Income Inequality, Neighborhood Racial/Ethnic Segregation, Racial/Ethnic Diversity, Unemployment and Violent Crime
- Physical environment factors: Air pollution, Limited access to Healthy foods and Walkability

Explain the link between all these measures, why are they related (i.e. diabetes, obesity and food access and walkability for an example)Your focus on the findings (similar or different health outcomes and link them to the socioeconomic factors you chose in your comparison. Include a conclusion in your presentation.

Explain why the two cities are different or similar in their health outcomes (socioeconomic, demographics …etc.)
For the power point presentation, display your data as you see fit (graphs, tables …etc.), the idea is to make the point of differences or similarities or compare both to the national average if they are similar.

You will present your work to the class (Virtually) in a 20 minute presentation, please have your slides limited to 15 to 20 slides. You can record your narrative in power point and upload to canvas. Each of you will be assigned reviewers that will view your presentation and comment on it.

For help on how to record voice in Power Point please read this article https://business.tutsplus.com/tutorials/powerpoint-narration–cms-29313

(Links to an external site.)

Final presentations are due on August 2nd, and reviewers will have two weeks to view and comment on each presentation.

Good Luck

Power Point Presentation

[Order Now]

Power Point Presentation

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.