Poster Presentation Nursing Research Paper

December 10, 2022

Poster Presentation Nursing Research Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Poster Presentation Nursing Research Paper

[Order Now]

Poster, Presentation, Nursing, Research, Paper

Poster Presentation

Students this project will allow you to formulate and hypothetically develop your own research project. The purpose of this project is for the student to follow all of the different steps in a research project on an already published article and presented as a poster presentation.

A poster session or poster presentation is the presentation of research information by an individual or representatives of research teams at a congress or conference with an academic or professional focus. The work is usually peer reviewed. Poster sessions are particularly prominent at scientific conferences such as medical congresses.

Students will select nursing research already published and following the article information you will create a poster presentation that include the below information:

The outline of the poster should include the following tabs (minimum requirements)

Abstract Outline:
-Title of Project
-Problem Statement: what is the problem that needs fixing?
-Purpose of the Project
-Research Question(s)
-Hypothesis
-Methodology (Qualitative vs. Quantitative)
-Steps in implementing your project
-Limitations
Results (Pretend results)
-Conclusion
-References

Criterion	Outstanding 4	Very Good 3	Good 2	Unacceptable 1	Score
Completeness	Complete in all respects; reflects all requirements	Complete in most respects; reflects most requirements	Incomplete many respects; reflects few requirements	Incomplete in most respects; does not reflect requirements
Understanding	Demonstrates excellent understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s)	Demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s)	Demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s)	Demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s)
Analysis	Presents an insightful and through analysis of the issue (s) identified	Presents a thorough analysis of most of the issue(s) identified	Presents a superficial analysis of some of the issue(s) identified	Presents an incomplete analysis of the issue(s) identified.
Evaluation	Makes appropriate and powerful connections between the issue(s) identified and the concept(s) studied	Makes appropriate connections between the issue(s) identified and the concept(s) studied	Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the issue(s) identified and the concept(s) studied	Makes little or no connection between the issue(s) identified and the concept(s) studied.
Opinion	Supports opinion with strong arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective	Supports opinion with reasons and evidence; presents a fairly balanced view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective	Supports opinion with limited reasons and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argument	Supports opinion with few reasons and little evidence; argument is one-sided and not objective.
Recommendations	Presents detailed, realistic, and appropriate recommendations clearly supported by the information presented and concepts studied	Presents specific, realistic and appropriate recommendation supported by the information presented and the concepts studied	Presents realistic or appropriate recommendation supported by the information presented and the concepts studied	Presents realistic or appropriate recommendation with little, if any, support from the information and the concepts studied.
Grammar and Spelling	Minimal spelling and grammar errors	Some spelling and grammar errors	Noticeable spelling and grammar errors	Unacceptable number of spelling and grammar errors
APA guidelines	Uses APA guidelines accurately and consistently to cite sources	Uses APA guidelines with minor violations to cite sources	Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA guidelines	Does not use APA guidelines
				Total

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Poster Presentation Nursing Research Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.