PJM 6910 Project Management Ethics Course Essay

December 14, 2022

PJM 6910 Project Management Ethics Course Essay

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

PJM 6910 Project Management Ethics Course Essay

PJM 6910, Project, Management, Ethics, Course, Essay

[Order Now]

Assignment Overview:

For this assignment, you will create a presentation for your peers around an ethical issue faced in project management, how it was handled, your analysis of how it was handled, and alternate recommendations for how it could be handled.

Learning Connection:

This assignment is directly linked to the following key learning outcomes from the course syllabus:

Assess and develop a position on a question of civic and global significance in the field of project management, taking into account both scholarship and published positions and narratives of relevant interest groups.

In addition to these key learning outcomes, you will also have the opportunity to evidence the following skills through completing this assignment:

Ethical reasoning • Critical thinking • Professional writing • Presentation skills • Organization

Assignment Instructions:

For this assignment, you will select and analyze an ethics in project management dilemma. Consider the following articles that review an ethical dilemma. To ensure that no one reviews the same article, please post your article name in the DB Post – Weeks 5-6 – Ethics Presentation.

Review those who have posted before you to ensure your article has not already been selected. Your deliverable is a presentation highlighting your analysis – including voice or detailed text notes that if read aloud would be as insightful as is spoken that will:

Summarize the ethical situation/issue/decision to be made – why it is one – problems it

creates for project and benefits in resolving • Analyze the action taken by the PM (Strengths and potential issue created) • Provide an alternate strategy (Plan) • Strengths and Possible Risks with that strategy (Plan) • Actions in Implementing (Do)

How to know if it resolved the ethical situation (Starting to Check) • Other actions to consider if not effective (Act) • Proactive actions to take on a “new” project to prevent this situation – how this could be implemented within an Ethics Policy on Project •

Connect in a component of the PMI Code of Ethics/General statement on why a code of ethics is important in PM • As a conclusion to your presentation, consider how this case may influence your team’s approach to your Ethics policy.

Below is a link to www.pmi.org – Ethics Articles. You do not need to use an article from this site – these are representative of the type of article you should use. Consider the NU library as another source, projectmanagement.com or other academic sites. Do not use wikipedia or other vendor type sites/blogs. If you have any questions on your article, reach out to your faculty member. • https://www.pmi.org/about/ethics/resources/articles

Be sure to include YOUR Name at the beginning of the file name for your document. • Submit the assignment using this “Submit Ethics Presentation” assignment link as well as the

Turnitin link below. • Submit your presentation to the Week 6 DB post – Ethics Dilemma Resolved! • Assignment is due no later than Week 5, Sunday at 11:59 PM (EST). • Assignment should be your own original work; any outside sources should be used to

illustrate or emphasize your point, not as a substitute for your own original writing. • Post article name in DB as soon as you have selected it – and be sure no one has already

claimed it. • Submit your work to the assignment link on Week 5 – Sunday, 11:59 p.m. • Submit your work to the Weeks 5-6 DB link. This is your DB work for Weeks 5-6. Review

and respond to at least 2 other presentations.

Note: You MUST properly cite and reference all sources using APA 6 format (see Purdue OWL and Citing Resources and Guidelines). Consult the NEU Library website (or the physical library) for further information.

[Order Now]

PJM 6910 Project Management Ethics Course Essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.