PICOT Question Literature Review

December 22, 2022

PICOT Question Literature Review

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

PICOT Question Literature Review

[Order Now]

Description

Write a Literature Review over PICO Question.

Question is in the Organizational Chart attached in the documents.

Please use the listed sources if they are not useful I am okay with you switching as long as they are credible, and you copy the APA formatted citation in the paper.

-Thank You

Using these Resources or if you find more credible ones that relate feel free to change them. Association Between Exclusive Breastfeeding and Infant Health Outcomes in Pakistan Saeed, Omar Babar et al. Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children and Families, Volume 50, e62 – e68

APA Bar, Sari; Milanaik, Ruth; Adesman, Andrew Long-term neurodevelopmental benefits of breastfeeding, Current Opinion in

Pediatrics: August 2016 – Volume 28 – Issue 4 – p 559-566 doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000389

Borkhoff, C. M., Dai, D. W. H., Jairam, J. A., Wong, P. D., Cox, K. A., Maguire, J. L., Birken, C. S., Macarthur, C., Parkin, P. C., & Collaboration, Targ. K. (2018). Breastfeeding to 12 mo and beyond: nutrition outcomes at 3 to 5 y of age. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 108(2), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqy124

Fern R. Hauck, John M. D. Thompson, Kawai O. Tanabe, Rachel Y. Moon, Mechtild M. Vennemann. Pediatrics Jul 2011, 128 (1) 103-110; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-3000 MacVicar, S., Humphrey, T., & Forbes, M. K. E. (2018). Breastfeeding and the substance‐exposed mother and baby. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care, 45(4), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12338

Madore, L. S., Bora, S., Erdei, C., Jumani, T., Dengos, A. R., & Sen, S. (2017). Effects of donor breastmilk feeding on growth and early neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants: An observational study. Clinical Therapeutics, 39(6), 1210-1220. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.05.341

Mirzaian, C. B., Vanderbilt, D. L., Mamey, M. R., Chmait, R. H., & Schrager, S. M. (2018). Duration of breastfeeding is associated with improved neurodevelopmental outcomes in survivors of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Breastfeeding Review, 26(2), 29–35.

Shattnawi KK. Healthcare Professionals’ Attitudes and Practices in Supporting and Promoting the Breastfeeding of Preterm Infants in NICUs. Advances in Neonatal Care : Official Journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses. 2017 Oct;17(5):390399. DOI: 10.1097/anc.0000000000000421.

Stuebe A. (2009). The risks of not breastfeeding for mothers and infants. Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology, 2(4), 222–231.

Umer, A., Hamilton, C., Edwards, R. A., Cottrell, L., Giacobbi, P., Innes, K., John, C., Kelley, G. A., Neal, W., & Lilly, C. (2019).

Association Between Breastfeeding and Childhood Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors. Maternal & Child Health Journal, 23(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2641-8

[Order Now]

PICOT Question Literature Review

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.