PHE4200 Capstone In Public Health Monica Lewis

December 27, 2022

PHE4200 Capstone In Public Health Monica Lewis

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

[Order Now]

PHE4200 Capstone In Public Health Monica Lewis

Week 8 ProjectAssignment Task: Submit to complete this assignment Due December 19 at 11:59 PM

Submit Draft Paper
THIS WEEK you will assemble your projects from weeks 1-7 into your final capstone paper.

To do this:

Cut and paste your prior weeks projects into a single document.
Each weekly project will be a separate section of the paper. Use APA guidelines to format the paper and its sections.
Merge your citations at the end of each weekly project paper into a single list of citations, using proper APA formatting.
Add TRANSITIONS and other language that allows the paper to ‘flow’. It shouldn’t read like a group of smaller papers stitched together. It should read like a single, coherent paper. If there is repetition in introductions or other areas, address that as well.
Submit this draft as your week 8 project.
Submission Details
Name your document SU_PHE4200_W8_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.
Submit your document to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.
Support your responses with examples.
Cite any sources in APA format.

Grading Rubric

PHE4200 Capstone In Public Health Monica Lewis

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.