Pharmacology Knowledge Case Study Assignment

December 1, 2022

Pharmacology Knowledge Case Study Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Pharmacology Knowledge Case Study Assignment

[Order Now]

Pharmacology makes up a significant portion of the PTCE and you will use drug knowledge on a daily basis. For this assignment, you will take the pharmacology practice exam in your Certification Exam Review text and report on your results. The exam itself is not graded.

Directions: Locate the Pharmacology Practice Exam in your Certification Exam Review text. Take the exam, and note how long it takes you to finish the exam. Then, determine your score by comparing your answers to the answer key in the back of the text. Take some time to review your answers and the questions you answered incorrectly. Then, in 3-5 paragraphs, write

Up a report that includes the following:

The score (out of 25) that you got on the exam and the time it took you to take the exam.

[Order Now]

The areas that you feel are your strengths and weaknesses. For example, are brand/generic conversions easy? Dosage forms challenging?

Discuss at least 3 questions that you answered incorrectly. Discuss at least 3 resources that you can use to help you reinforce your pharmacology knowledge and prepare for that portion of the exam.

Pharmacology Knowledge Case Study Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.