Persuasion Map and Annotated Bibliography

January 21, 2023

Persuasion Map and Annotated Bibliography

Order Number	6545623584345868
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Persuasion Map and Annotated Bibliography

first article to read: https://hbr.org/2014/07/managements-three-eras-a-brief-history

https://www.edrawsoft.com/what-is-persuasion-map.html

https://guides.rasmussen.edu/apa/annotatedbib

The article is relatively recent and casts a new perspective on management practices from the past 100+ years. Each of the three “ages” of management McGrath puts forth emphasizes a different theme: execution, expertise, and empathy. McGrath makes the argument that we have passed through these ages or eras (and, incidentally, are at the brink of a new age – but that is out of scope for this assignment).

-You will need to research existing management theories and look for correlations with each of McGrath’s eras (that is, look for a management theory in which you feel “empathy” is utilized, for example). There are two parts to this assignment: Create a persuasion map that supports McGrath’s theory. Research the literature to find management theories that justify each of the three ages (execution, expertise, empathy).

– The map should be concise, with “evidence” in bullet or short sentence form. Evidence will take the form of theories that we will be exploring in class this semester. Thus, you will perform a high-level survey of management theories and align 3 (or more) management theories from the 20th or 21st century with each of McGrath’s ages. It doesn’t matter which management era or theory you choose from. Accompany the map with an annotated bibliography of your research sources.

– Expected: minimum of 5 to a maximum of 7 bibliography entries (total) for the assignment.

-Be sure your literature review and related bibliography are clearly representative of each age/evidence theory pairing. The annotated summaries should each be one to two paragraphs in length (around 150 words per summary), written clearly and concisely in APA 7th format.

Sample persuasion map: A hierarchy type template: The first level box is labeled, Image adapted from: https://www.edrawsoft.com/what-is-persuasion-map.html Persuasion maps can take on many forms. Feel free to explore and locate a form / template with which you are comfortable. You do not need to include a “conclusion” box on the map, although you may if you wish (see link below for clarification).

[Order Now]

Persuasion Map and Annotated Bibliography

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.