Order Number |
6556423678445678 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY/DISERTATION |
Writer Level |
PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED |
Format |
APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD |
Academic Sources |
10 -20 |
Page Count |
4-8 PAGES |
personal assessment of management skills
Part (a): Discussion post format Include the following information as a numbered-bullet list (as shown below) in your discussion post (don’t lose points by not numbering your responses): NEVER COPY/PASTE QUESTION PROMPTS INTO YOUR DISCUSSION POST! (It looks unprofessional and not university-level work. Only include your responses into your graded discussion submission.) Identify one (of the two) PIA assessments that you will discuss in this post. In other words, for bullet #1, simply write, “Personal Assessment of Management Skills” OR “Organizational Structure Assessment”. Write a 1-paragraph substantive summary (5-7 sentences) of what the PIA you selected was about and what you learned about yourself through this activity (i.e., discuss strengths and weaknesses). Provide at least one example of how being aware of this knowledge relates to how you make (or will make) management decisions. Write a 1-paragraph substantive summary (5-7 sentences) reflecting on something new that you have learned about anything in this module, as you understand it, and why it is important for any manager to understand (even if they are not specifically an HR manager) and how it can be applied in the decision-making process. Be sure that your paragraph includes a 1-sentence statement of your own thoughts regarding the IMPLICATIONS of understanding this new information (i.e., the “WHY” you believe this information is critically important) and Underline & Bold this sentence, it represents your thesis statement (i.e., topic sentence, central idea) of .why you consider it important. Be sure to include the reference to the new information as a direct object in your thesis sentence (not a pronoun or indirect object) as your thesis sentence should stand alone without need for contextual reference. For example, “I believe that active listening is important for any manager who works with employees to practice because this means we are listening for understanding others’ perspectives and to solve problems, not simply listening to respond to a conversation.” NOT, “I believe it is important for any manager…” (Links to an external site.)You may want to review “Tips for Writing a Thesis Statemen (Links to an external site.)t” The implications sentence is your thesis statement that articulates a main idea Write a question you still have about HRM or PIA that you still have.
Here is the example post and please write the reponse for it:
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/
personal assessment of management skills