Pattersons The Knowing Consumer Sociology Discussion Essay

November 29, 2022

Pattersons The Knowing Consumer Sociology Discussion Essay

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Pattersons The Knowing Consumer Sociology Discussion Essay

[Order Now]

Answer all of the following questions in short essay format

1.) C. Wright Mills spends a large portion of The Promise arguing in part of an age old debate of whether or not sociology is a social science or a social study. What is the difference in these two? Which did Mills support? Based on your own interpretation of the reading, and your general knowledge of sociology, do you believe it is more of a social science of a social study?

2.) Using Marx’s Bourgeois and Proletarians explain in what ways does the bourgeois furnish the proletariat with weapons to overthrow them? What are these weapons, and how are they utilized (if at all) by the proletariat?

3.)In Stupidity “Deconstructed” Joanna Kadi talks about how many people seem to think that “rich equals smart, poor equals stupid.” What meanings does Kadi give for this opinion, and does she seem to support or oppose this viewpoint? Please make sure to explain why.

[Order Now]

4.) Please explain the difference in ‘youth culture’ and ‘Youth Culture’. Give examples from the text, and your own understanding of the topic.

5.) In Patterson’s The Knowing Consumer, explain the two main groups in society that he describes. Compare them to another reading that you have done thus far in this class.

Pattersons The Knowing Consumer Sociology Discussion Essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.