Pablo Picasso Old guitarist

December 21, 2022

Pablo Picasso Old guitarist

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Pablo Picasso Old guitarist

[Order Now]

Description

Please read over the document that I have attached and answer the two parts at the end Which would be the PART VI: Function and PART VII Cultural connections. The first part should be half a page and the last one should be a page long.

The sources that you should use are as followed: https://www.pablopicasso.org/old-guitarist.jsp https://www.artic.edu/artworks/28067/the-old-guitarist https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/art-1010/cubism-early-abstraction/cubism/a/picassos-early-work

Only these three sources are allowed as they were approved by the professor and no other sites.

PART VI: FUNCTION

**Type your answers in complete sentences & in paragraph form. Type INTO this document.

**Identify and cut & paste an image of the artist or (if none is available) of the culture/historical period INTO the MP document.

-This section DOES require research (from approved sources only) AND in text citations.

-Do NOT cut and paste from other sources but paraphrase in your OWN words.

-Direct quotes may be cut & pasted (w/citation) but max 1 (short) direct quote per section.

• State the general function of the artwork (religious devotion, personal expression, historical documentation, political propaganda, civic ritual, etc). • If known, elaborate on the circumstances of the commission, ie: who paid for it (patron), what site the artwork was made for and how it was intended to be used. If the artwork was a community commission (ie: an African mask or sculpture), discuss the role the artwork served in civic ritual. Add specifics and cite the source of information.

• If known, discuss the statement that the artist/patron was making through art. If possible, find a quote by the artist or patron explaining his/her statement. Cite the source of information.

**Here is where you get a chance to discuss WHY the artwork was made (the underlying intent of the artist/patron/culture).

PART VII: CULTURAL CONNECTIONS –

**Type your answers in complete sentences & in paragraph form. 200 words minimum.

**Personal opinion here – NO research required but you DO need to reflect on what you learned in Parts III-VI. A good score here is dependent on a good score on Parts III-VI.

**Do NOT just repeat what you stated in previous sections but add personal reflections. ·

Looking back on your comments from the beginning of the semester (Parts I & II), compare your personal experience of your focus artwork, before versus after the research that you did on its form, content, context and function. · Elaborate on the cultural differences & (most importantly) the underlying similarities that you discovered through research on your focus artist/patron/artwork. Be specific. ·

Reflect on how your discovery of these underlying connections between cultures may have changed (or reinforced?) your present-day perspective of cultures different than your own. Make sure to reference your own personal situation, ie: whether you grew up exposed to many cultures or had a more sheltered environment. ·

Finally, reflect on how your experience of art this semester has been influenced by the current Covid pandemic. In times of adversity, can art help? Please be honest!

[Order Now]

Pablo Picasso Old guitarist

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.