Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Order The Bottled Water Company
The Bottled Water Company: Budgetary facts and figures Additionally, complete the budgeted income statement, linking the numbers from the supporting budgets to the income statement. Note that you are not given the information to complete the budgeted balance sheet, so a balance sheet is not expected to be a part of the assignment package. Finally, prepare an executive summary to Ginnie Adams, the owner of the Bottled Water Company, with your results from the comprehensive budget for the new product and how launching the new product would affect net income. Because this project requires both a detailed and lengthy Excel component as well as an MSWord component, you will be submitting it in two parts. Both parts are due by the end of Week 8. You will upload them to the grade center separately and your instructor will grade them using two separate rubrics. Part 1 is worth 225 points of the final project grade and should include: 1. Sales Budget 2. Production Budget 3. Direct Materials Budget 4. Direct Labor Budget 5. Overhead Budget 6. Selling and Administrative Expense Budget 7. Cost of Goods Manufactured Budget 8. Budget and Income Statement Part 2 is worth 125 points of the final project grade and should include: 1. Executive Summary (2-3 pages) You are encouraged to convert both your Excel workbook and MS Word executive summary to PDF files prior to submission to ensure the formatting of each remains as you have designed it. If you do not do this conversion, the Waypoint grading system will and some of your formatting may be lost. Part 1 will be graded mostly on your correct computations and ability to construct each unique budget from a set of given data. Part 2 will be graded on both content and writing mechanics. You must address the results of your comprehensive budget as well as explain how launching the new proposed product would impact net income, and you must do this in conformity with CSU-Global’s requirements for APA style and expectations for college-level writing. Please see the Portfolio Project rubrics for specific grading criteria.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/