Order Support Progress And Motivation Discussion

December 24, 2022

Order Support Progress And Motivation Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

[Order Now]

Order Support Progress And Motivation Discussion

Step 1: Search for articles

Perform an Internet search, or using the AU Library, locate two scholarly articles which examine specific ways that instructors can help keep their learners on track and successful in an online course. Look for open access academic articles in particular. Use the following site to get started with your search:

Education research global observatory. (http://www.ergobservatory.info/contact.html)

Step 2: Read the articles and write a summary

Read the articles and consider how you might integrate these techniques, ideas or theories in your own online course. Write a 3- to 4-page summary report detailing what the articles say about methods to ensure student success. Make sure to give proper attribution to sources using APA formatting. Include a link to your presentation in the report. If you are using PowerPoint for your presentation, simply upload the file along with your report.

Order Support Progress And Motivation Discussion

Step 3: Create a slide presentation

Create a 10- to 12-slide presentation describing student success in an online environment. The presentation can be made PowerPoint The presentation must include all of the following:

Overview of teacher and student responsibilities in the online environment.
Evaluation of the technical and organizational skills necessary for student success in online learning.
Evaluation of resources and tools that support student success in the online course.
Techniques and strategies you will be using to keep students moving ahead and on track in your course.
Detailed narration, notes or written text on each screen describing the above information.
Include specific examples and/or personal experiences to illuminate your description of the concepts you are presenting throughout.

You should synthesize what you learned from a minimum of three (3) scholarly sources with your original thought throughout your presentation. Use APA formatting for in-text citations and a References slide for all images as well as paraphrases, summaries, and quotes.
You should adhere to effective slide presentation design standards.

Step 4: Add presenter’s notes

If you use PowerPoint, these notes can be embedded within the presentation notes area. If you use Prezi or another tool that does not allow text information, please submit a document with your talking points or script for each slide of the presentation. You may also narrate your slides instead of providing a script.

[Order Now]

Order Support Progress And Motivation Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.