Order Law Ethics And Corporate Governance

January 2, 2023

Order Law Ethics And Corporate Governance

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Order Law Ethics And Corporate Governance

The discussion answer must be a minimum of 125 words of substance with all references cited in APA format. (Do not write a page) No copying and pasting of work previously done for someone else.

1. In today’s economy, there are a wide number of powerful companies who in all appearances control massive segments of different markets. Using the Internet, identify one (1) example of a large company that has (or might be) engaged in anti-competitive behavior. Next, suggest three (3) ways that this behavior could be viewed as either a horizontal or vertical restraint of trade. Provide support for your response.

Order Law Ethics And Corporate Governance

2. In a separate paragraph, take a contrary view and discuss why you believe the behavior identified with google (below) could be deemed as not being a restraint of trade. Justify your response.

Google showed anti-competitive behavior when the company tried to maintain the dominance of its search engine. Three ways that suggest this behavior could be viewed as a horizontal restraint of trade is through monopolization, price-fixing, and refusal to deal/group boycotts. To support this response the reasons are listed as follows: Google improved its search results by copying contents from websites such as Amazon and then threatened to remove Amazon from its website if they objected. Google also forbid companies from bolstering advertising campaigns on other websites using data they gathered from advertising on Goggle’s ad platform; as well as restricting websites from displaying search results from both Google and one of its competitors. Finally, Google admitted they were at fault to the FTC by knowingly placing inferior content in front of customers so it could promote Google +.

Order Law Ethics And Corporate Governance

Grading Rubric

Order Law Ethics And Corporate Governance

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.