Order Business Management Theories Discussion

January 3, 2023

Order Business Management Theories Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Order Business Management Theories Discussion

Choose two management theories from the list provided in the attached file; One that is the most interesting to you and another theory that is the most confusing (they have to be different theories).
Choose two management theories from the list provided in the attached file; One that is the most interesting to you and another theory that is the most confusing (they have to be different theories). Write a 5–7-page paper that is divided into the two sections below (most interesting theory and most confusing theory) and answer the questions provided for each section.

This paper should be 5-7 pages long, double-spaced, with a font size of 12. No Plagiarism! List all sources in a work cited page.

Section I: The Most Interesting Theory

· Define the theory in your own words

· Discuss the specific aspects of the theory that are interesting and explain how/why these aspects are interesting

· Explain how this theory can be seen in the real world today (provide specific examples; they can be personal experiences or fictional scenarios)

· How can this theory change the way people view the world (can include their own reflection and the way this theory has shifted/changed their worldview)

Order Business Management Theories Discussion

Section II: The Most Confusing Theory

· Define the theory in your own words

· Explain the specific aspects of the theory that are confusing and explain how/why these aspects are confusing (ex: is it too abstract, is too nuanced, is it difficult to think of a real word example, is it too broad, etc.)?

· Provide some research that you did to clarify and understand the theory (examples/definitions from the reading, the slides, or the internet).

· If someone was learning this theory, how would you describe this theory in a way that makes it more clear? (in other words, how would you incorporate your new understanding when breaking this down; this bullet point requires the student to re-define the theory and describe their new understanding.)

[Order Now]

Order Business Management Theories Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.