Opponent of thesis X

February 8, 2023

Opponent of thesis X

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Opponent of thesis X

Your task is to act as a discussant (opponent) of the thesis attached below. Your main focus is to point out choices the author has done throughout the thesis and evaluate whether those choices are the best way to answer the research question. Therefore, pay special attention to the research funnel/vase/hour glass. Can we deem this thesis trustworthy research and does it make the contribution it promise?

In this paper, you must need to use the literature (book attached below) and reference your claims. It is not enough to make statements (such as “I think the theory chapter is ok…”). You need to argue your case throughout the text (i.e., such as “the theory chapter, bringing up theories x and y, is an intelligent choice because it allows us to see the issue from angel A or B, that other theories wouldn’t have allowed…” or “the idea that the thesis is based on a social constructivist point of view is reasonable because… But it is problematic that the authors then treat the data as existing in the positivist sense..”).

Structure your essay by:

start with ½ page summing up the thesis from a methodology point of view, describing the design choices the author made.

Continue discussing the thesis by identifying the major weaknesses and strengths and structure your paper around these.

Conclude your essay by evaluating whether the thesis makes the contribution it promises and if it is trustworthy or not. Do this by referring to its validity, reliability and generalizability.

Only use the book and the example thesis for sources, no external sources!

[Order Now]

Opponent of thesis X

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.