Operation of Google Assignment

December 16, 2022

Operation of Google Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Operation of Google Assignment

Operation, Google, Assignment

Scenario/Summary

In the United States, Google maintains its market share and seems well-positioned for continual rapid growth into the future. The company has dominated the search market, cornered the advertising space, and is well on its way toward winning Windows-like market share in the mobile space. However, it has run into several major problems with its international operations.

A number of countries are finding more and more issues with Google. These include the European Union’s claim of anti-competitiveness practices with Google’s search services and China’s politically based restrictions limiting accessibility.

In this week’s case study, you will be investigating the problems Google has faced in this area and what it did to attempt to deal with them. Two of the references given in this week’s assignment will help get you started in your research and identify the problem(s) that Google faced.

Deliverables

Your deliverable this week will be a completed case study (3 to 5 pages) submitted on the issues Google faced and what the response to them was

Case Study Steps

STEP 1: Research Issue

In this step, you need to find out the questions “how” and “why” of Google’s problems. Start with reading what has been written about it in your reading assignment this week—two of the references deal with Google’s problems:

“Growing Pains for Google” by Elizabet Montalbo

“Google’s Growing Pains” by Edward Cone

Using these as a start to give you an overview of the problems Google faced. These articles, along with others you will find in your research and on the Web, should allow you to answer the “how” and “why” of the situation Google faced and their actions in handling it.

STEP 2: Write the Study

Use the case study template to complete a 3–5-page report on your research. Include the sections listed below as needed.

Introduction—a brief introduction to the company and its problem or situation

Issue/Problems—identify all the issues or problems faced by the company

Actions Taken—what was the company’s response on dealing with the issues?

Results—what were the results of the company’s efforts? Did they work? Why or why not?

References—list all research references used

Don’t forget to proof and fact-check your case study. If you are using quotes from sources, or data from an unreliable source, you should attempt to find a better source, or remove them. This is sometimes called “establishing rigor.” Make sure your case study is credible, transferable, verifiable, and dependable.

[Order Now]

Operation of Google Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.