OGL563 Dynamics of Social Change in Firms

December 15, 2022

OGL563 Dynamics of Social Change in Firms

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

OGL563 Dynamics of Social Change in Firms

OGL563, Dynamics, Social, Change, Firms

Fall A, 2021

The final project for the course is an analytical research paper that focuses on the organizational and leadership dynamics of a social change organization of your choice.

When choosing the organization, you want to examine it can be either an organization that you have personally participated (or are participating) in, or it can be an organization (contemporary or historical) you are familiar with through reading.

By “analytical research paper,” I mean that the purpose of this paper is for you to provide an in- depth analysis of the organization of your choosing.

In providing that analysis, you will draw on readings from this class, outside literature researched on your own (please use a minimum of five academic sources that are not included on our syllabus), and (depending on your engagement with the organization) your personal experience.

If you are writing about an organization, you did not personally work within, you will also likely need to do some reading (or potentially interview members) about the organization’s history to be able to respond to the sections (below).

The format of the paper will follow Michael Brown’s process for building and strengthening a community organization presented in Building Strong Community Organizations and the analysis of social change organizations discussed in From the Ground Up.

This paper will also require some self-reflection on social change organizations and the student’s leadership initiatives in bringing about positive change.

This paper is an analysis of an organization rather than, for example, a paper synthesizing research results or making an original argument. As such, it follows a relatively straightforward format (detailed below).

Each of the section headers (bold, in red) should be used verbatim as the section headers in your paper. Each section will also give specific instructions and a list of questions. The sections are intended to ensure that you focus your analysis on specific dimensions of the organization.

Although you will be writing in a narrative format, please make sure to respond to the questions (in bold) under each section header. However, because this is an analytical research paper you should not simply respond to the questions, but use the question as a guide in offering an analysis (in paragraph format) within each section.

Please note that some of the questions may be more or less difficult for you to answer depending on your personal experience with the organization (or they may be phrased in a way that implies you are working with the organization when you didn’t).

Please feel free to respond to “the spirit” of these questions and do your best to answer them given the information you have available and your positionality with the organization.

For details, check attached pdf.

Sources from the syllabus:

Chetkovich, C., & Kunreuther, F. (2006). From the ground up: Grassroots organizations making social change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Chapters 1 and 2. [These chapters will be the basis of the Collaborative Annotation Assignment this week. If you prefer, you may consider reading them in Perusall]

Brown, M.J. (2006). Building powerful community organizations: A personal guide to creating groups that can solve problems and change the world. Arlington, Massachusetts: Long Haul Press. Chapters 1 and 2.

Jobin-Leeds, G., & AgitArte. (2016). When we fight, we win! Twenty-first-century social movements and the activists that are transforming our world. New York: The New Press. Chapter 2.

Ryan, C., & Gamson, W. A. (2015). Are Frames Enough? In Goodwin, J., & Jasper, J.M. (Ed.) The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts, Third Edition (pp. 136-142). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

[Order Now]

OGL563 Dynamics of Social Change in Firms

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.