Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder Discussion

November 25, 2022

Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Obsessive, Compulsive, Personality, Disorder, Discussion

[Order Now]

Describe the pathological personality traits associated with obsessive-compulsive personality disorder. & respond back to 2 others classmates

reply back to them 2 please

Dominique Carter

Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder is described as a preoccupation of perfectionism and orderliness with a controlling characteristic that has an extreme factor in one’s everyday life and routines. It causes emotional constriction and imbalance with relationships. Personality traits associated with OCPD include organization, excessiveness and caution, known to be workaholics who get stubborn and rigidity, especially when completing tasks. People who have this disorder tend to strictly follow rules and schedules to attain perfectionism, but there is also excessive doubt. When something or someone interferes with their plans, including when themselves don’t follow their own rules and schedules, they become very upset.

Taylor Davis (She/Her)

People with obsessive-compulsive personality disorder have personality traits that revolve around perfectionism. Their personality is full of diligence because they strive for challenging goals that are normally out of reach. They can come off as stubborn as well as possessive, this is because they are attached to a set of rules created by themselves or someone else. If someone were to mess their flow up while trying to accomplish a goal, it would negatively impact them and send them into a spiral. One thing that I found interesting was the fact that many people with this disorder see some people as “inferior” to them and will treat them badly compared to someone of a higher power. They don’t tolerate people’s quirks very well and it’s hard for them to see things from another person’s perspective.

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.