Nursing Leadership Knowledge Skills to Plan Organizational Change

December 10, 2022

Nursing Leadership Knowledge Skills to Plan Organizational Change

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Nursing Leadership Knowledge Skills to Plan Organizational Change

[Order Now]

Nursing, Leadership, Knowledge, Skills, Plan, Organizational, Change

Week 6: Planned Change: Leadership of Reduction in Workforce

Assignment Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this experiential learning activity is to apply nursing leadership knowledge and skills to plan for organizational change with system-wide impact. (CO 2, 3, 5)

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to:

Create an evidence-based plan for system-wide change guided by a selected organizational change model
Engage in high-level decision-making processes common in the nurse executive role
Use reflective practice knowledge and skills in making high level decision making and change management

Preparing the Assignment

Address all components of the Advanced Communication in Systems Leadership paper as outlined under “Assignment Directions and Criteria”.
The paper is graded on quality and completeness of information, depth of thought, organization following outline provided, substantive narrative, use of citations, use of Standard English, and writing conventions.
Format:
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association(current ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Is the source used for this paper
Required elements
Title page, reference page
Use Microsoft Word
Page numbers, running head, doubles-spaced, times new roman, 12pt font, 1” margins, level 1 headings
Paper length: 7 maximum, excluding reference page and title page
Scholarly sources
Minimum of four (4) scholarly resources no older than 5 years (See: What is a Scholarly Source under APA resources)
Proof-reading
Use spell check and grammar check and correct all errors
Compare final draft to detailed outline directions to ensure all required elements included

iii. Submitting the paper

Submit to Week 2 Assignment portal by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT
Must achieve TII score < 24% to be graded
Final submission only will be graded

DIRECTIONS AND ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA

You will use the following headings for your paper:

Approach to the organizational mandate
Purpose of the paper
Overview of the tasks, potential challenges, and implications of a reduction in workforce
Part II: Reduction in Workforce-Deciding
Using Human Resources (HR) metrics Table 1
Approach, choices, rationale
Challenges presented (including role of ethics)
Using HR metrics with Relative Information Table 2
Approach, choices, rational
Challenges presented

iii. Conflicts raised

Negotiation used

III. Part III: Reduction in Workforce-Planning the Change

Overview of reorganization plan including timeline
Plan for change and application of Kotter’s or Rogers’ change model
Anticipated conflict (three areas) and the benefits of using a change model
Healthy work environment
Describe department and system-wide implications, impact, and conflict
Strategies for addressing morale and motivation of remaining workforce
Summary/Conclusions
Restatement of purpose
Overview of tasks
What was learned

Part I: Approach to the Organizational Mandate

In this section, provide a statement of purpose for the paper and overview of what will be covered in the paper, including the overview of tasks, potential challenges, and implications of a reduction in workforce in general.

Part II: Reduction in Workforce-Deciding

This section deals with the initial task of determining which employees that will be let go during the reduction in workforce. In Section A, you are to select the 10 positions based solely on the information in Table 1. The questions following the table address the content that should be included in your paper. Once completed, move to Section B, Table 2 and again address the content being asked in your paper.

Scenario

Roxboro Medical Center is a 200-bed inpatient facility located in a sprawling suburban area in the rural south. Until two years ago, it was the only medical facility within a 75-mile radius when The Jonas Center, a 100-bed day hospital and ambulatory care center, opened 25 miles away. Over the past two years, Roxboro has lost approximately 25% of its market share.

The 10% drop last year was adjusted for through re-organization of the workforce, reduction in hours, attrition of employees through early retirement and changing jobs to the new facility.

However, this year there has been an additional 15% decline in market share resulting in a dire need to reduce the workforce. Since Roxboro is restricted by mandatory staffing ratios, and last year they lost the maximum number of staff possible and still remain within regulatory compliance.

The board of directors, CEO, and CFO have determined a 30% reduction in the management workforce across the hospital will be needed. The timeline for this to occur is over the next six (6) months. It will be up to the department heads to determine how they will reduce the positions and re-organize job duties.

Section A: Table 1: Human Resource Manager Work Metrics

You are the Chief Nursing Officer and have the largest number of management positions because yours is the largest department in the hospital. With a total of 33 positions that include house supervisors, unit managers, and charge nurses, you are being asked to reduce the total number by 30%, or ten (10) positions. Further attrition through job changes or retirement is not anticipated.

Human Resources has established two criteria for the reduction in workforce (RIF). These are last hired and low performance. Each department is sent a chart that includes this information on employees who have been with the hospital 15 years or less and the performance rating for each.

Your table has no identifiers and while you might have an idea of who the people are, you have only positions information available. Your table looks like this:

Roxboro Medical Center Human Resources Manager Work Metrics
Position	Years since Hire	Time in Management	Performance Rating Ave/Recent	Unit Size/ number of beds	RIF or Stay Rationale
HS.1	10	3 years	High/High
HS.2	12	8 years	High/High
HS.3	15	12 years	High/Low
UM.1	6	2 years	High/High
UM.2	5	18 months	High/High
UM.3	4	2 years	High/Low
UM.4	7	5 years	High/Low
UM.5	10	9 mths	High/High
UM.6	15	5 years	High/Low
CN.1	5	1 year	High/High
CN.2	8	4 years	High/High
CN.3	3	2 years	High/High
CN.4	2	6 mths	Too soon to evaluate
CN.5	12	4 years	High/Low
CN.6	6	2 years	High/Low
CN.7	8	3 years	High/Low
*Performance evaluations are expressed as A/R = average for years in position/most recent year HS=House Supervisor: UM=Unit Manager; CN=Charge Nurse;

Based only on the Human Resources given you in this table include the following information in your paper:

Who will you choose? Rationale?

What was your approach to making the selection?

How easy or difficult was it to make your decisions with only this information?

What challenges were presented in making these choices?

Section B: Table 2: Human Resource Manager Work Metrics with Related Information

The word is out that the RIF is going to occur though no details of the process have been shared with the employees. You’re getting calls frequently from some of the staff who want to know if they are in danger of being dismissed or sharing reasons why they can’t be.

Since making your preliminary decision of who to let go, and before you’ve made any announcements, you record the information you received from some of the staff and placed it in your table. Now the table includes the size of the units where each of these positions is located which will be important in the reorganization, and some of the personal information gleaned from telephone calls you’ve received. Having these pieces of information causes you to question your original decisions. The shaded area contains the information now known to you and is not part of the table that came from HR.

Roxboro Medical Center Manager Work Metrics with Relative Information
Position	Years since Hire	Time in Management	Performance Rating Ave/Recent	Unit Size/number of beds	Relative information

HS.1	10	3 years	High/High	200
HS.2	12	8 years	High/High	200
HS.3	15	12 years	High/Low	200	Finished nursing school together	Single grandparent; has custody of two grandchildren; 34 yo
UM.1	6	2 years	High/High	20	Daughter of nurse in another unit
UM.2	5	18 months	High/High	30	Transferred from another unit after RIF last year
UM.3	4	2 years	High/Low	20		On FMLA for past 4 months; pre-eclampsia for one month prior to leave
UM.4	7	5 years	High/Low	30	Father is major contributor to dialysis center
UM.5	10	9 mths	High/High	15		Husband is second shift informatics supervisor for last 18 mths; potential for RIF
UM.6	15	5 years	High/Low	30	Negative attitude; slow to comply with changes	Single parent; one middles school child
CN.1	5	1 year	High/High	30		AONE Certified Nurse Manager
CN.2	8	4 years	High/High	20
CN.3	3	2 years	High/High	30	Mentors new graduate nurses
CN.4	2	6 mths	Too soon to evaluate	20
CN.5	12	4 years	High/Low	20	has moved up leadership ladder from LPN to CN with Roxboro
CN.6	6	2 years	High/Low	30		Best friend was RIF last year
CN.7	8	3 years	High/Low	20	Serves on Shared Governance Committee
*Performance evaluations are expressed as A/R = average for years in position/most recent year HS=House Supervisor: UM=Unit Manager; CN=Charge Nurse;

With the new information that is now in the table, how are you preliminary decisions changed?

Who will you choose? Rationale? What changes did you make to your original decision?

What was your approach to making the selection?

How easy or difficult was it to make your decisions with the additional information?

What challenges were presented in making these choices?

What role did ethics play in your choices?

Describe your internal conflict that occurred having this additional information.

How and with whom will you negotiate for your choices?

Part III: Reduction in Workforce-Planning the Change

The next part of your task is to reorganize/restructure the remaining workforce using the remaining employees. You were give a 6 month window of time to complete the RIF. This section deals with planning for the change.

Provide an overview of what the restructuring will look like, i.e. assuming you have 6 units and your workforce now consists of 23 management positions, how will you cover the units with the leadership and management needed.

Detail your plan for change using Kotter’s or Rogers’ change model that includes a timeline for implementation and a description of how decisions will be disseminated

Address three areas of anticipated conflict and how they can be mitigated through use of the change model

Part IV: Healthy work environment

This section addresses how a healthy work environment is maintained during a reduction in workforce. Describe the department and system-wide implications, impact, and potential conflicts that can occur with your RIF in general. Provide at two concrete strategies for addressing morale and motivation of remaining workforce.

Part V: Summary

The final section, summary should contain a restatement of purpose, and overview of what was accomplished, and what you learned from the process.

Category	Points	%	Description

Approach to the organizational mandate	30	30%	Purpose of the paper; Overview of the tasks, potential challenges, and implications of a reduction in workforce
Reduction in Workforce-Deciding Section A	50	50%	Human Resources (HR) metrics Table 1 used;; Approach to decision making, positions chosen identified, rationale for choices, ease or difficulty in making decision; challenges to decision-making presented
Reduction in Workforce-Deciding Section B	50	50%	Human Resources (HR) metrics with Relative Information Table 2 used; approach to decision making; positions chosen identified with rationale including reasons for change; ease or difficulty in making decision, challenges to decision-making presented; role of ethics in choice; internal conflict described; negotiation for exceptions described
Reduction in Workforce-Planning the Change	50	50%	Overview of reorganization plan; Plan for change and application of Kotter’s or Rogers’ change model; Anticipated conflict and the benefits of using a change model described
Healthy work environment	30	30%	Describe department and system-wide implications, impact, and conflict; At least 2 concrete strategies for addressing morale and motivation of remaining workforce
Summary/Conclusions	20	20%	Restatement of purpose; overview of tasks; what was learned

Scholarly support	10	10%	Minimum of 4 scholarly sources no older than 5 years old
Writing conventions, format, and reference citations	10	10%	Writing is clear concise without grammatical and spelling errors. All references are correctly cited (if applicable) and written.
			A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR 534 Healthcare Systems Management

NR 534 Week 6: Planned Change: RIF 02.21.19nhs

Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria	Exceptional (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance	Exceeds (88%) Very good or high level of performance	Meets (80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance	Needs Improvement (38%) Poor or failing level of performance	Developing (0) Unsatisfactory level of performance
Content Possible Points = 250 Points
Section One: Staffing Budget and FTEs
Approach to Organizational Mandate Purpose of the paper; Overview of the tasks, potential challenges, and implications of a reduction in workforce	30 Points	20 Points	10 Points		0 Points
	Approach to Reduction in Workforce Case Study is clearly articulated and contains all the elements needed to address the situation presented in the scenario.	Approach to Reduction in Workforce Case Study is generally described and contains nearly all elements needed to address the situation presented in the scenario.	Approach to Reduction in Workforce Case Study is minimally described, generally stated and missing key elements needed to address the situation presented in the scenario.		Approach to Reduction in Workforce Case Study is absent or does not contain adequate elements to all the elements needed to address the situation presented in the scenario.
Reduction in Workforce-Deciding Section A Human Resources (HR) metrics Table 1 used; Approach to decision making, positions chosen identified, rationale for choices, ease or difficulty in making decision; challenges to decision-making presented	50 points	46 points	37 points	28 points	0 Points
	All six (6) elements are addressed accurately and clearly articulated;	Five (5) of six (6) elements are addressed and clearly articulated; remaining element generally addressed	Four (4) of six(6) elements are addressed and clearly articulated; other elements are generally addressed	Three (3) of six (6) elements are addressed and clearly articulated; remaining elements are generally addressed	No elements are addressed with specificity; more than three criteria missing
Reduction in Workforce-Deciding Section B Human Resources (HR) metrics with Relative Information Table 2 used; approach to decision making; positions chosen identified with rationale including reasons for change; ease or difficulty in making decision, challenges to decision-making presented; role of ethics in choice; internal conflict described; negotiation for exceptions described	50	46	37	28	0 points
	All six (6) elements are addressed accurately and clearly articulated;	Five (5) of six (6) elements are addressed and clearly articulated; remaining element generally addressed	Four (4) of six(6) elements are addressed and clearly articulated; other elements are generally addressed	Three (3) of six (6) elements are addressed and clearly articulated; remaining elements are generally addressed	No elements are addressed with specificity; more than three criteria missing
Reduction in Workforce-Planning the Change Overview of reorganization plan; Plan for change and application of Kotter’s or Rogers’ change model; Anticipated conflict (3 areas) and the benefits of using a change model described	50 Points	46 points	37 points	28 points	0 Points
	All four (4) elements are addressed accurately and clearly articulated;	Three (3) of four(4) elements are addressed and clearly articulated; remaining element generally addressed	Two (2) of four (4) elements are addressed and clearly articulated; other elements are generally addressed	One (1) of four (4) elements are addressed and clearly articulated; remaining elements are generally addressed	No elements are addressed with specificity; more than three criteria missing
Healthy work environment Describe department and system-wide implications, impact, and conflict; At least 2 concrete strategies for addressing morale and motivation of remaining workforce	30 Points	24 points	18 points	12 Points	0 points
	All five (5) elements are addressed completely, accurately, and are clearly articulated;	Four (4) of five (5) elements are addressed completely, accurately, and are clearly articulated; remaining element generally addressed	Three (3) of five(5) elements are addressed completely, accurately, and are clearly articulated; other elements are generally addressed	Two (2) of five (5) elements are addressed and clearly articulated; remaining elements are generally addressed	No elements are addressed with specificity; more than three criteria missing
Summary/Conclusions Restatement of purpose; overview of tasks; what was learned	20 points	16 points	8 points		0 points
	All criteria are accurately addressed and clearly articulated	Two of three criteria are accurately addressed and clearly articulated	One of three criteria is accurately addressed and clearly articulated; OR all criteria are generally addressed		Criteria are minimally addressed; absent; or unrelated to the content of the paper

Scholarly support Minimum of 4 scholarly sources no older than 5 years old	10 points	8 points	4 points		0 Points
	At least four (4) sources are no older than 5 years	Only three sources are no older than 5 years	Only two sources are no older than 5 years		Less than two sources are no older than 5 years
Writing conventions, format, and reference citations Writing is clear concise without grammatical and spelling errors. All references are correctly cited (if applicable), and referenced on reference page using correct APA rules and format.	10 Points	8 points	5 points		0 Points
	No errors in any of the three elements of writing conventions, format, and reference citations	One error in any of the three elements of writing conventions, format, and reference citations	Two errors in any of the three elements of writing conventions, format, and reference citations		More than three errors in any of the three elements of writing conventions, format, and reference citations
Total Points			_____of 250 points

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Nursing Leadership Knowledge Skills to Plan Organizational Change

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.