Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
NURS 425 Evolution into Professional Nursing Practice
NURS 425, Evolution, Professional, Nursing, Practice
Course Description
This course is designed to provide students with an overview of content related to leadership and management theories and to examine multiple nursing issues. Emphasis is twofold: (1) it is placed on broadening students’ understanding of the role(s) and responsibilities of professional nursing, and on recognizing the need for continuing professional learning and (2) gaining an understanding of the role of the nurse in managing others in the provision of direct care to the client.
End of Program Student Learning Outcomes
Upon completion of the Undergraduate Nursing Program, the graduate will be able to:
Student Learning Outcomes
Upon completion of the course, the student will be able to:
Required Texts
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.) Washington, D.C.: Author. ISBN: 9781433805615
Marquis, B. L., & Huston, C. J. (2017). Leadership Roles and Management Functions in Nursing: Theory and Application (9th ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer Health. ISBN:
9781496349798
Supplemental/Recommended Text or Reference Material
Sprayberry, L. D. (2014). A response to the transformation of America’s healthcare: Direct-care nurses bringing FLOWERS (TM) to the bedside. Medsurg Nursing. 23(2), 123-130.
Instructional Methods
Lecture with discussion Small group work Guided independent study
Student led presentations Clinical Conferences Adaptive learning
Case Studies Client interactions
Evaluation Methods
Exams (3) | 18% each |
Quiz | 6% |
Scholarly Paper | 7.5% |
Final Exam | 25% |
ATI Adaptive Learning | 2.5% |
ATI Proctored Exam
IX. Grading Scale |
5% |
A = 92 – 100
B = 83 – 91 C = 75 – 82 |
|
D = 68 -74
F = below 67.5 |
ATI Proctored Exam Grading:
Level 3 (88.3% – 100%) =100%
Level 2 (76.7% – 86.7% = 91%
Level 1 (61.7% – 75%) = 75%
Below Level 1 = 68%
Final grade ending > .5 will be rounded up to nearest whole number
Assignment
This is an independent activity which requires submission of a scholarly paper, according to the instructions below. The scholarly paper will be graded based on the Evaluation of Undergraduate Scholarly Paper rubric, which is included in this syllabus.
Scholarly Paper: Using the PICOT process, analyze a current nursing practice-related issues. Select an issue from your NURS 412 clinical practice and write a PICOT research question.
The scholarly paper should be typed, double spaced, 12 point, Times New Roman using APA format, and limited to 6 pages including title and reference pages. The references cannot be older than 2018. EVALUATION OF UNDERGRADUATE SCHOLARLY PAPER RUBRIC WILL BE USED.
Support your position with references no older than 2018 from at least two peer reviewed journal reference articles.
Unit I: The Critical Triad: Decision Making, Management, and Leadership
Unit II: Foundations for Effective Leadership and Management Ethics, Law, and Advocacy
Unit III: Roles and Functions in Planning, Staffing and Directing
Unit IV: Managing Ethics, Law and Advocacy.
Quality Control
Unit V: Roles and Functions in Controlling
Assignments are to be submitted on time and via electronic media (Blackboard or email). All assignments must display knowledge of the content standards and principles of the program. Assignments must be completed on time and in compliance with specified guidelines. Assignments submitted late are subject to 5 points reduction for each day late . Assignments submitted after three (3) business days may not be accepted.
Students will abide by the University Policy regarding Academic Honesty in the current Bowie State University Undergraduate Academic Catalog.
Office hours are listed above. If you need to reach me anytime other than those listed above, the most effective way is via email using your Bowie State University email account only.
Students will abide by the grading system according to the University Policy in the current Bowie State University Undergraduate Academic Catalog
Students who have a disability and think that they may need special accommodations should report to the Office of Disability Support Services (DSS) in Room 079, Thurgood Marshall Library, or call Dr. Michael Hughes at (301) 860-4067.
Technology
This course is web enhanced with Blackboard. Students can access using the following link https://bsuonline.blackboard.com/webapps/login/ . If assistance is needed with initiating an account, please call the
DIT Helpdesk@ 301 860- 4357
Course material and announcements will be posted on Blackboard. Students will be held accountable for posted material and announcements.
Cell phones, pagers, beepers or any other “attention-grabbing” device are to be turned off or silence before class begins. It is distracting and discourteous to both the instructor and your colleagues.
XII. Evaluation of Scholarly Paper Rubrics:
EVALUATION OF UNDERGRADUATE SCHOLARLY PAPER Student_____________________
CRITERIA | Value % | % Earned | COMMENTS |
Content and Thought
The content of the scholarly paper is an indicator of the thought processes used by the student in the development and execution of the assignment. The indicators of these processes are: 1. Uses relevant references. 2. Addresses all components of assigned criteria. 3. Synthesizes information. 4. Applies theories and concepts. 5. Uses logical reasoning and correct inductive or deductive reasoning. |
60 | ||
Organization Structure
1. Includes purpose in introduction. 2. Paper is logically arranged with introduction, body, and summary. 3. Subsections and paragraphs reflect the main idea. 4. Transitions occur between thoughts. |
15 | ||
Literacy and Style
1. Uses professional vocabulary. 2. Uses correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. 3. Maintains economy of expression. |
15 | ||
APA
1. Title page is correct. 2. Page numbering is accurate. 3. Page header is appropriate. |
10 | ||
4. Citation of references in text is correct.
· Direct quotes · Paraphrasing 5. Reference list follows APA format. · Citations in text are included on reference list · Reference list citations are included in text |
|||
Final Grade | 100 |
XIII. Additional Rubrics (optional):
Disclaimer: The syllabus is subject to content modification as necessary to facilitate the best learning experience
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/