NUR4945 Unit 1 Lesson 1 Assignment

January 19, 2023

NUR4945 Unit 1 Lesson 1 Assignment

Order Number	6567867858947698
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

NUR4945- Unit 1 Lesson 1 Assignment

All good authors who communicate well must reflect on what is about to be discussed. Most writers cannot simply sit and write down their thoughts. Writing clearly will take planning, and an intention to be truthful and clear. For this writing assignment you are to:

Consider your impression of the reflective process described in the chapter. Describe how reflection will be used in your preparation for the final project. Discuss what can be done to make a paper/project scholarly. Discuss how to include the interprofessional healthcare team in the project Consider what type of private insurance increases the subscriber’s choice of provider and improves access to services financially or through an increased approved network of providers? Discuss how to include diverse populations in your capstone project Explain how reflection contributes to a paper/project being scholarly. Use two references for this three page paper.

[Order Now]

NUR4945 Unit 1 Lesson 1 Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.