Order Number |
6786465467 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Curing AIDS Discussion
Watch the TedTalk video and answer the question prompts.
If we can cure people of various diseases, like malaria and hepatitis C, why can’t we cure HIV?
What lessons can we learn from other diseases and apply to HIV/AIDS?
Why is HIV/AIDS so unique?
Link (Links to an external site.)
Northridge Rhetorical Artifacts Analysis
Prompt:
Purpose
The first two sections of the class covered what constitutes rhetoric and how politicians use rhetoric to respond to the unique needs and features of different rhetorical situations. For this assignment, you are to apply some of the concepts/theories we have covered to a rhetorical artifact of your choosing (e.g. speech, public statement, political advertisement, interview) related to a contemporary policy idea or proposal. The artifact you chose should not be one we have discussed in lecture.
Prompt
Your analysis should answer the following questions in an essay:
How to Succeed on this Assignment
– Typed, double-spaced, standard margins and 12 point font
– 2-3 pages
– Reference at least two readings assigned so far in class
-A works cited page for any references to course texts and examples
Reference specific quotations from the text you are analyzing rather than merely saying things like “the speaker debated to get generate support for the bill” or “the speech wanted people to vote for her as president.”
This paper is asking you to identify how you think the artifact addressed responded to the context and tried to shape our assessment a political situation. This is in part a biased/personal response – that is fine, and unavoidable. The key is to connect your observations to readings/concepts from class.
UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW
On Rhetorical Circulation Mary E. Stuckey Rhetoric & Public Affairs, Volume15, Number 4, Winter 2012, pp. 609-612 (Article) Published by Michigan State University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/490118 [ Access provided at 28 Jan 2021 21:46 GMT from Calif State Univ @ Northridge] ON RHETORICAL CIRCULATION MARY E. STUCKEY A s I understand it, circulation impinges on every aspect of rhetorical theory and criticism. From Michael Warner’s insight that circulation begets communities1 through Michael McGee’s important work on fragmentation2 and Lester Olson’s observation that recirculation always involves the repurposing of texts,3 to Benjamin Lee and Edward LiPalma’s argument that by performing and circulating performances of institutions and social roles those