New Drivers for Migration Essay Questions

November 29, 2022

New Drivers for Migration Essay Questions

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

New Drivers for Migration Essay Questions

[Order Now]

Quiz 3, Friday, May 7, 12:30-12:50pm

Prompt question: How does the literature on assimilation/integration differ from what is
often said, say, on television? How different/similar is the process in each setting? Please explain.

Week 7: February 14: Refugees/Forced Migrations

David FitzGerald and Rawan Arar. 2018. “The Sociology of Refugee Migration.” Annual
Review of Sociology 44: 387–406

Saskia Sassen. 2016. “A Massive Loss of Habitat: New Drivers for Migration.” Sociology
of Development 2.2: 204-233

Prompt question: How does the assigned literature explain the difference between refugees and migrants and why? Please explain.
Week 8: February 21: No Class—Presidents’ Day
Week 9: February 28: Migration Deterrence, Deportation, and Unintended Consequences

David FitzGerald. 2020. “Remote Control of Migration: Theorising Territoriality, Shared
Coercion, and Deterrence.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46.1: 4-22

Douglas Massey and Jorge Durand. 2003. “The Costs of Contradiction: US Border Policy
1986-2000.” Latino Studies 1.2: 232-252

Harsha Walia. 2021. Border and Rule: Global Migration, Capitalism, and the Rise of Racist Nationalism. Chicago: Haymarket, Chapter 4 (pp. 77-92)

Prompt question: Just how old is our deportation apparatus and what are some of the more recent unintended consequences? Please explain.

Week 10: March 7 (no class): Beyond Trump and BREXIT

Richard Alba and Nancy Foner. 2017. “Immigration and the Geography of Polarization.”
City & Community 16.3: 1-5

[Order Now]

Gurminder Bhambra. 2017. “Brexit, Trump, and ‘methodological whiteness’: on the
misrecognition of race and class.” British Journal of Sociology 68: 214-232

Walia, Border & Rule, Chapter 11 (pp. 196-211)

Prompt question: How does anti-immigrant racism connect to the rise of Trump and
Brexit? Or, how do migrant populations resist xenophobic racism? Please explain.

New Drivers for Migration Essay Questions

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.