Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Case Study:
You are part of a team at Murphy Stores, a major retailer, deciding whether to allocate $7 million of the company’s remaining (and limited) capital budget to either an investment in RFID technology to reduce merchandise theft from stores, or to invest in new energy-efficient store lighting to reduce operating costs and be better for the environment, or some combination of the two. For this assignment, you will prepare a business case for one of the projects. The two alternative investments focus on making financial improvements in two different aspects of Murphy Stores’ operations: decreasing “shrink” due to theft and saving on electricity costs. The case offers the opportunity to learn about retail industry operations as well as to make multiple full NPV discounted cash flow analyses in capital budgeting. All the information you need is within the case study, but you will be required to draw reasonable conclusion from the case, as not every detail is present. Please pay particular attention to the financial details provided, as they will be helpful in your analyses.
After determining the proposed project, just answer the following two parts:
1. Project Overview
This section describes high-level information about the project to include a description (high level scope), assumptions, and constraints.
2. Expected Benefits
This section should describe the anticipated outcome if the proposed project or initiative is implemented. It should include how the project will benefit the business and describe what the end state of the project should be.
500-600 words,double spaces.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/or