MTSS Infographic

January 23, 2023

MTSS Infographic

Order Number	64576585756332525
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

MTSS Infographic

Part 1: RTI Pathway to Support Struggling Readers

As you have learned in previous coursework, Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) is a framework to provide targeted

support to all students. It involves a collaborative approach using data-based decision-making to design a support system

for the academic, behavioral, and social-emotional development of the whole child. To provide academic support, we

respond to intervention (RTI) within the MTSS framework. The approach originated as a way to prevent reading failure for the vast majority of students, through the application of three tiers of support: Tier 1 (Primary Prevention), Tier 2

(Secondary Prevention), and Tier 3 (Tertiary Prevention).

Use an online infographic of your choice to create a one-page infographic to share with families explaining the RTI tiers

as a pathway to support students who struggle with reading. In the infographic, include the following:

Describe Tiers 1, 2, and 3.

Identify student proficiency in each grade level K-3 which would qualify for Tiers 1, 2, and 3.

Select one grade level and provide two examples of reading strategies to support learning during each tiered level.

Provide a link to at least one resource for each tiered level that provides information to assist families in supporting RTI at home.

In addition to the above, your infographic should be organized with graphics embedded to support the language presented.

Part 2: Summary

Write a 250-500 word explanation to support what you have selected within the three tiers. Your response should include

scholarly support on current best practices for students, with and without exceptionalities, who struggle with reading

within the three tiered levels.

Support your infographic with 2-3 scholarly resources.

While APA style format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the

expectations for successful completion.

[Order Now]

MTSS Infographic

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.