MSUB Feminism and the Ethics of Care Paper

December 17, 2022

MSUB Feminism and the Ethics of Care Paper
Description
Reaction Papers
:
There will be three reaction papers this semester that should be three pages long, double-spaced, in Times
New Roman, 12 point font. These papers require you to summarize the material and detail your reaction to
it. You are to select a work we have covered, identify the author and title of the work, write an informative
summary of the material, condense the content of the work by highlighting its main points and key
supporting points, use direct quotation to illustrate important ideas in the work, and keep the summary
objective and factual. The papers should also include your personal reaction to the reading, whether you
agree/disagree with the author and why, how it has changed your thinking or expanded it, how is the work
related to present-day problems, how is it related to your life, experiences and/or indicate whether the work
is accurate, complete, organized, etc.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.