MSU Sex Ratios in China Case Study Discussion

November 29, 2022

MSU Sex Ratios in China Case Study Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

MSU Sex Ratios in China Case Study Discussion

[Order Now]

Topic – Sex Ratios in China: A Result of the One Child Policy

You will research and present on a family-related sociological topic.You will prepare a brochure on your topic to be posted.(it is recommended that you use a program such as Microsoft Publisher).Your brochure must include a complete and accurate citation list, so be sure to leave space for this during the design stage. Your brochure should highlight key points from your research and should be formatted both creatively and clearly.

You will also present your research by recording an uploading a video presentation using Mediasite (presentations should use PowerPoint or Prezi and be approximately 10-15 minutes).Your presentation will expand on your brochure by including examples and illustrations from your research, as well as highlighting your research findings.Your research should concentrate on academic and scientific sources.(try the library first), rather than popular sources (magazines, newspapers, or websites, although you may use these sources to support your other research). You may not use Wikipedia or dictionaries/encyclopedias. You must have at least seven sources and at least four of those must be academic in nature.

[Order Now]

Note: I will create a Video out of Powerpoint. This listing is only for Powerpoint research. I will make brochure. minimum of seven sources with 4 being academic in nature. plan on 10-15 slides because it needs to be 10 minutes long. for powerpoint content, keep detailed notes (100-150 words) to say within a minute as a comment/note. Thank you.

MSU Sex Ratios in China Case Study Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.