Motivational and Emotional Biases Question

December 21, 2022

Motivational and Emotional Biases Question

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Motivational and Emotional Biases Question

[Order Now]

Question Description

This question is being asked in this format to set the pledge and make a deposit of 50% as required. The question is reflected below again as precaution to eliminate any miscommunication.

Motivational and Emotional Biases

Think about your process of making decisions that have conflicting long-term and short-term interests and then write a paper that is grammatically correct, 600 – 800 words in length, and cites sources in accordance with APA standards answering the following:

a. Discuss the influences of motivational and emotional biases on one’s personal decision making process giving an example that analyzes the issues involved and devise a plan that helps one put these biases in check, while providing a detailed explanation of the analysis that demonstrates clear, insightful critical thinking.

b. Using a real-world example, illustrate the negative impacts that motivational and emotional biases have on organizational decision making and then analyze the issues that are involved and prepare a
persuasive argument to convince the organization with which you are familiar to adopt a decision making process that is protected from the undue influences of these biases.

c. Provide an example of how motivational or emotional biases have caused you to make less than optimal decisions in the past. What strategy could you pursue that would reduce the likelihood of making a similar decision in the future?

Motivational and Emotional Biases Question

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.