Motivation to Work Discussion Essay Questions

November 25, 2022

Motivation to Work Discussion Essay Questions

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Motivation, to, Work, Discussion, Essay, Questions

[Order Now]

Read chapter 8 OF THE TEXTBOOK and make an open ended question based off of reading chapter 8.

CHAPTER 8 – MOTIVATION TO WORK

AFTER COMING UP WITH AN OPEN ENDED QUESTION, WRITE A DESCRIPTION OF WHAT’S YOUR LOGIC BEHIND IT.

Make sure the question is OPEN ENDED!

THE DECRIPTION SHOULD BE 200 WORDS.

TEXTBOOK IS ATTACHED BELOW.

DO NOT COPY PASTE FROM TEXTBOOK. DO NOT PLAGARIZE. OUTSIDE SOURCE MAY BE USED MAKE SURE TO PROVIDE LINK.

Second PART: reply to 2 people, it should be 150+ words for each. Reply to these two discussion posts. They both have different question they have answered. Reply if you agree with there decription for the question and/or your thoughts.

How can companies effectively implement goal setting theory?

Everything we do can be boiled down to goals. You could consider your morning routine a series of goals i.e. making breakfast, getting dressed, leaving on time, etc. What makes the difference is setting specific difficult goals like the textbook suggests. The issue with this becomes how do you define a good or quality goal especially in the workplace setting. Companies constantly have employees setting goals for their projects, meetings, and reports. The issue becomes when these goals are effectively created, tracked, rewarded, and reviewed. This leads to my question on how can companies effectively use goal setting theory. Should managers and team leads be required to learn about it? Should companies track how well certain reward systems work? How can companies evaluate if an employee has too many or too few goals set.

Source: Work in the 21st Century: An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology

What can someone do when situational constraints hold them back?

The model for performance is motivation multiplied by the ability and subtracting situational constraints. However, what can an employee or manager do if situational constraints are holding performance back? As an employee, it may seem very hard to do anything as they do not control the workplace. How can one change things?

As an employer or manager it might be easier to change the situation, but how do they do that without ‘stepping on toes’ or creating a new constraining solution? There are probably many ways to help, but what do you think is the best?

Source: Work in the 21st Century An Introduction To Industrial and Organizational Psychology Sixth Edition

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Motivation to Work Discussion Essay Questions

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.