Motivation Letter for University Admissions

December 20, 2022

Motivation Letter for University Admissions

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Motivation Letter for University Admissions

I am being dismissed from APUS (a university) because as a veteran their online learning is the worst experience ever. The Veterans Administration pays too much money for veterans to go back to school post war to be cheated. There are no visuals, pre-recorded classes, virtual classes nothing of the sort, it’s just read online outdated books, complete forums and do tests. I am trying to get into a better online program at the University of Arizona, but I have a very low GPA because I am a government worker and essential during COVID and work was a lot. I also suffer from depression and was being treated by my therapist at the VA and the school knew this. I spoke to a school administrator at the University of Arizona and she asked me to submit a letter with my application explaining my situation. I need help writing a convincing letter so I can be admitted. Some other reasons I suffered a low GPA:

• This school does not care about its students. They do not answer questions in a timely manner no do they resolve issues between the student and teachers. You pay almost $900.00 to teach yourself. All the teachers do is grade your papers.

• Students receive a substandard education because faculty don’t have time to truly develop learner’s • Many of us are military or former military. With some form of PTSD so we are trying to get an education dealing with our issues.

• Instructors teach their opinion.

• Had trouble with a few of my classes asked for help and was denied by professor went to academics asking for help and was told that an extension was requested but was

• They don’t update classes and don’t provide textbooks (or ones that aren’t 10 years old).

Motivation Letter for University Admissions

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.