Moral Problems Philosophy Discussion Assignment

December 17, 2022

Moral Problems Philosophy Discussion Assignment
Description
Using the passage in the link can you answer the questions using basic terms of moral issues and philosophy.
1. Briefly explain how someone focusing on rules (right actions) would approach this case. Make sure you are explicit about how aspects of the case relate to this form of thinking. In your response, you need to be clear how you are identifying the appropriate rule(s) or determining what a right action is. If there is some particular piece of information or detail not provided that is necessary to make sense of the case using this type of moral reasoning, identify it and note how it impacts the assessment.
2.Briefly explain how someone focusing on character would approach this case. Make sure you are explicit about how aspects of the case relate to this form of thinking. In your response, you need to be clear what specific virtues you are using in your reasoning. If there is some particular piece of information or detail not provided that is necessary to make sense of the case using this type of moral reasoning, identify it and note how it impacts the assessment.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.