Module 5: Bargaining and Audience Costs

February 7, 2023

Module 5: Bargaining and Audience Costs

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Module 5: Bargaining and Audience Costs

The discussion has two parts. This is the first one, if it’s done well, I will hire again for the second part.

For references, you are to only use the ones provided in the files.

Citations:

Jack S. Levy and William Thompson, Causes of War. Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 63-70.

Renshon, Jonathan, Keren Yarhi-Milo, and Joshua D. Kertzer. “Democratic reputations in crises and war.” The Journal of Politics 85, no. 1 (2023): 000-000.

Instructions:

250 for each question, 500 words max. Please do not include in-text citations in the word count.

For citations in the text please only do (author name and page number). So I can know where you go the answer from.

Please do not put too many quotes, try to put them in your own words. And be clear with your argument.

Prompt questions: choose only two questions from below to write about. Do not do all three.

1) Does the ‘rational theory of war’ explain variance in war? If so, how?

2) Is the ‘rational theory of war’ a Realist theory of war?

3) How does the Renshon et al. study help us understand the democratic peace?

Tips for a Writing Good Essay from the teacher:

State your thesis clearly in the first sentence; spend the rest of the essay explaining it; wrap up with a summary sentence. Write in an active prose. For instance, “This paper argues . . .” or “I argue . . “ are far better than “In this paper, I will argue. . .” Write clearly what you intend to express: never leave anything for the reader to guess at or interpret. Do not use word games, slang, or jargon. For instance, do not use catch phrases like “play the democracy card.” Do not imply things and assume the reader gets the implication. For instance, do not write that “X only did Y” without explanation, as if the reader is supposed to understand what X was supposed to be doing. Write as if your audience is from a different culture: make every sentence representative of what you intend to say. Avoid rhetorical questions unless you answer them. Do not assert something as true merely because you think it is true. If it is necessary to make a factual assumption for a larger argument, just be explicit in your assumption and acknowledge it might not be true. For instance, you can say, “if dogs could fly, then . . .”. Do not use the words “proven” or “disproven” unless you are referring to a logical or math proof. Use instead terms such as “for” and “against”, “supportive”, “corroborates”, etc.

[Order Now]

Module 5: Bargaining and Audience Costs

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.