MKTG 302 Op-Ed on Marketing Ethics Paper

December 8, 2022

MKTG 302 Op-Ed on Marketing Ethics Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

MKTG 302 Op-Ed on Marketing Ethics Paper

[Order Now]

Summary

An op-ed, or opinion editorial, is an argumentative essay that presents the writer’s opinion or thoughts about an issue. Op-eds aim to persuade others and can substantiate the writer as an expert on a subject. An Op-Ed is an assignment that mirrors “real word” applications outside the classroom.

This essay assignment has two deliverables which combined are worth 5% of your course grade. You are required to submit a revised and improved final draft regardless of your first draft performance. You must fully engage in the writing exercise and demonstrate substantial improvement to receive full points.

Deliverables will be submitted via cougar courses to the corresponding “turn it in” container – please check your course for deadlines. You will receive feedback on the first draft submitted to allow you to improve your writing.

Assignment Format

Approximately 500 words
Single-spaced
Include a cover page with the following: a descriptive title (not just “Report”), author’s name, class and section numbers, and date of submission
Use business-appropriate fonts and margin
Insert page numbers (except for the cover page, which should NOT be numbered)
Please note that due to the short format, there is no need for a table of contents and/or executive summary
The use of headings/sub-headings is likely unnecessary given the short nature of this assignment – please exercise judgment
Cite references using APA style – use the resources at the end of this guide!

Topic

Consumers have often dealt with a sneaky problem in the shelves of supermarkets economists have termed shrinkflation – that is, when items shrink in size or quantity, or even sometimes are reformulated or reduced in quality while their prices remain the same. Here are some recent examples. Your task is to write an op-ed in response to the current trend of increasing shrinkflation in the marketplace. In your response, you should:

Connect your ideas to what you have learned about marketing – the 4Ps and creating value in the marketplace.
Discuss how can marketers remain ethical in a marketplace where this practice is prevalent.

○ What would be an ethical and effective way for marketers to convey the changes in product/price to avoid losing customers and brand loyalty?

○ Should there be a disclosure notifying consumers of this change? And if so, how could this be done effectively?

○ How can you apply the common ethical philosophies discussed in chapter 2?

Cite at least one source to provide evidence for your claim(s). A convincing op-ed is NOT purely based on opinion – your thesis needs to be backed up.
You are practicing writing as a business professional (i.e., the perspective of a marketer or other business executive not a consumer).

Essay Structure

The purpose of an Op-Ed is to sway public opinion and change minds using a convincing argument and presenting it in a concise, readable way. Editorials are written according to a well-established formula:

Introduction – state the problem ● Body – expresses an opinion ● Solution – offers a solution to the problem ● Conclusion – emphasizes the main issue

https://www.businessinsider.com/shrinkflation-grocery-stores-pringles-cereal-candy-bars-chocolate-toilet-paper-cadbury-2021-7#heftys-mega-pack-went-from-90-bags-to-80-bags-at-the-same-price-4

https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2021/07/06/1012409112/beware-of-shrinkflation-inflations-devious-cousin

Lead paragraph: Try to grab readers right away with your first sentence; make them want to read more. Start with an interesting story or example that encapsulates your point.

Supporting paragraphs: Now that you’ve stated your point and grabbed readers’ attention, build on your lead with facts, statistics, and anecdotes.

Wrap it up: In the concluding paragraph, take your argument a step further and leave readers with information about what needs to be done next. If you’re trying to move people to action, be sure to answer the question, “What can I do?” Make the final sentence as compelling as the first one. If you started with an example, bring the story full circle by referencing your original point.

Writing an Op-Ed

Think of an opinion piece as a persuasive essay: the writer has an opinion or a point of view on an issue and he or she wants to convince the reader to agree. This is not as easy as it may seem.

Start with a sentence. Try to sum up your opinion in a single sentence to begin, then think about facts and anecdotes to support your initial point. The first line of an op-ed is crucial. The opening “hook” may grab the reader’s attention with a strong claim, a surprising fact, a metaphor, a mystery, or a counter-intuitive observation that entices the reader into reading more. The opening also briefly lays the foundation for your argument.
State your opinion clearly. An op-ed is about your opinion and perspective. Put your argument forward in a persuasive, authoritative manner. However, it is important to acknowledge the other side. People writing op-ed articles sometimes make the mistake of piling on one reason after another why they’re right and their opponents are wrong.

Your writing will be more credible, and almost certainly more humble and appealing if you take a moment to acknowledge the ways in which your opponents are right. When you see experienced op-ed authors saying “to be sure,” that’s what they’re doing.

Be informal BUT professional. Use simple, everyday language that is easy to understand. Keep in mind you are writing for a general audience that may not be as familiar with your subject as you are. Use the active voice. Don’t write: “It is hoped that [or: One would hope that] the government will …” Instead, say “I hope the government will …” Active voice is nearly always better than passive voice. It’s easier to read, and it leaves no doubt about who is doing the hoping, recommending or other action.

Keep it short and simple. State your opinion clearly and quickly, back it up with facts and examples, then finish up. Use short sentences and paragraphs. Look at some op-ed articles and count the number of words per sentence. You’ll probably find the sentences to be quite short. You should use the same style, relying mainly on simple declarative sentences. Cut long paragraphs into two or more shorter ones.
Do your research. You must research your topic and find out what’s happening and what went on in the past. You must know the facts and be able to refer to them in your argument (Pretend you are a lawyer and you are making a case before a jury. You will want to convince the members of the jury to believe that your client is right. Therefore, you need to present as much evidence as you can that proves the point. You do the same when you write a column or editorial). Use facts and details to back up your opinion and help you make your case.
Finish strong. Leave your readers with a lasting impression — a strong point that will make them consider your point of view.

Writing Tools and Resources

Use the writing guide posted in cougar courses. This reference was created for CoBA students by a couple of faculty members to help with senior experience projects
Please consider visiting the Writing Center, which is committed to your growth in all stages of the writing process (brainstorming, planning, drafting, revising). For the best results, go early and often for an assignment.
This website offers great tips and tricks on writing an op-ed: https://www.theopedproject.org/oped-basics
This website offers excellent resources to support your writing development – especially if you need guidance on proper APA citation: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/purdue_owl.html
Online tools like http://www.hemingwayapp.com/ and https://www.grammarly.com can help you strengthen your writing by identifying common grammar mistakes as you type.
Citation help: http://www.citationmachine.net (please note that you need to check the citation produced for accuracy – not all websites and publications are detected correctly).

MKTG 302 Op-Ed on Marketing Ethics Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.