Mimicry in sea dragons

January 21, 2023

Mimicry in sea dragons

Order Number	653368557544675
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

EXAMPLE OF ADAPTATION: Mimicry in sea dragons

You will need to conduct some research and describe an example of adaptation by natural selection. You can use any example, including those from living species or fossil species. Your example can be from any animal, plant, or even bacteria. Just remember that an adaptation is something that results from natural selection because it increased an individual’s fitness (i.e. ability to survive and reproduce). Your example must be of an adaptation caused by natural selection (not something that is due to genetic drift or gene flow alone).

Once you have conducted independent research to learn about Mimicry in sea dragons, write a discussion post explaining how your example demonstrates adaptation by natural selection. Describe the adaptation in detail by answering the following questions:

What is it?

Why is this trait considered to be adaptive?

How does it increase fitness of the individuals that have it?

What is the selective pressure that drove this adaptation?

Feel free to include pictures (remember to provide citations). You are encouraged to also discuss what you thought was interesting or surprising about your example, along with any remaining questions you might have. Please provide at least one citation beyond the course lessons.

[Order Now]

Mimicry in sea dragons

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.