Military Science

January 9, 2023

Military Science

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Military Science

Prepare and submit of an essay 10 pages in length using at least 4 peer reviewed journal articles, with the remainder being textbooks, and government reports. All citations included in your response(s) must follow APA format guidelines and submitted as a Microsoft Word document file. Topic: pick a specific location similar to the three locations listed such as (e.g., Washington Monument, Mall of America, New York Stock Exchange, Walt Disney World) and determine how you would prepare a preparedness plan for an emergency that will be effective if an attack is brought against that specific site that you select.

Please explain: why you selected this specific location why it might be chosen by a terrorist organization as a high value target address such issues as: symbolic attack economic attack mass casualties, etc. how and what data you would need to collect what you would do with the data once collected what planning/preparation aspects would need to be accomplished to be successful In this piece, you need to think from the point of view of a government and private entity by placing yourself in the mind of a terrorist/extremist, either domestic or international, and then back in the mindset of a government representative preparing an emergency preparedness plan. This assignment will be something that will prepare you for your requirement comprising the final assignment in this course.

Remember that you must support your assessment and positions with information from a text, web sites, and with journal article(s). Remember that in graduate work journal articles are considered to be the best support for your position when researching and writing. Make sure you search out the relevant journals containing peer reviewed articles pertaining to terrorism and terrorist activities. Use the Add submission button below to submit your assignment.

[Order Now]

Military Science

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.