Methodology of Qualitative Research Paper

December 3, 2022

Methodology of Qualitative Research Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Methodology of Qualitative Research Paper

[Order Now]

Methodology, Qualitative, Research, Paper

The requirement for Methodology part that I’m working on is to look up what age group social media influencers are getting brand deals from their brand like dollar shave from “Unilever” that should be on the younger side. The research is on social media users. I will write up a survey and share it to my friends/followers.

That is my sample. Also, look up “Unilever” Let’s say that Dollar shave is my brand. Look up their target. Make sure when you do research. Make 2 references on APA format. I have already written what methods in my part on File: “data methods” but Part 1 shows the rest that are given the idea of the topic.

Tesla Electric Vehicles Project Report

For the applied project report, you require to work on “Tesla Electric Vehicles” (Remember you should be specific…e.g. not Airbnb as a whole, but Airbnb’s Gift Card; not Santander Bank as a whole, but Santander’s municipal finance program).

for the project you should explore Tesla Electric Vehicles and their marketing campaign…. as know tesla doesn’t spend any money on advertising so you can explore what are the main gaps in the customer environment for the marketing of the Tesla Electric Vehicles.

See the attached template for the report. your report should be 13-17 pages, double-spaced,

****Add an executive summary. The summary should tell the readers what are the main gaps in the customer environment, and how should the organization should close these gaps.

*****Remember to create a table of contents. Make sure the section headings are original and specific to your report. Do not repeat the generic headings found in this template.

Tip: Do not praise or complement the organization. Imagine this report would be read by managers in the organization. They’re looking for helpful advice about what they should do in the future, not praise or compliments.

Remember to draw on secondary sources: industry magazines, peer-reviewed articles, marketing databases available online – find some sources in the attached file.

Add photos and tables (either in the body of the report or in the appendix).

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Methodology of Qualitative Research Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.