Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
This final assignment is designed to help you conceptualize and articulate the basic characteristics of the proposed research plan. In previous weeks, you have learned how to logically structure or design a study meant to uncover data that produces a clear-cut answer (or answers) to the research question (or questions). You have also learned how to search the literature, identify your participant pool, and gather and analyze data.
In this assignment, you will incorporate feedback you have received from your instructor on previous assignments and create a recorded presentation of approximately 15 slides. This presentation includes work you have previously done, which you will revise and convert to slides and narration. Further, the presentation will include a focus on an evaluation strategy for the newly established services to people who are homeless.
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following EPAS and practice behaviors:
C4: Engage In Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice
C4.GP.A Use practice experience and theory to inform scientific inquiry and research.
C4.GP.B Apply critical thinking to engage in analysis of quantitative and qualitative research methods and research findings.
C9.GP.A Select and use appropriate methods for evaluation of outcomes.
C9.GP.C Critically analyze, monitor, and evaluate intervention and program processes and outcomes.
Instructions
Include the following in your presentation. Use the titles below for the headings of each section. The number of slides indicated for each section are suggestions.
Introduction (1 slide).
Provide a brief overview of the presentation.
Intervention Strategies (1 slide).
Explain the intervention strategies that will be offered at the shelter.
Synthesis of Literature (2 slides).
Explain the process of refining a research problem into a measurable research question.
Provide a synthesis of the best practices literature from the literature review. Be sure to summarize and evaluate the literature and explain the contributions each could make to the proposed study.
Potential Participants (1 slide).
Identify the potential research participants, including explanation for the choice.
Methods (2 slides).
Explain the methods you would use in your proposed study, including justification.
Data Collection (2 slides).
Explain the sources and methods of data collection.
Data Analysis (2 slides).
Explain how data will be analyzed.
Limitations (1 slide).
Describe any limitations that can be foreseen in the proposed study.
Dissemination Plan (2 slides).
Describe the primary audience and dissemination plan for the results.
Conclusion (1 slide).
Summarize the proposed study.
Evaluate the potential for further study of the research problem.
References.
Note: In addition to posting the link to your recording, attach your PowerPoint file with speaker notes to your assignment submission.
Additional Requirements
The assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current Evidence and APA standards.
Length of presentation: Approximately 15 slides.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/