MD1 A Different Kind of Research 6733

January 11, 2023

MD1 A Different Kind of Research 6733

Order Number	6554656396
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

MD1 A Different Kind of Research 6733

Teacher inquiry is a powerful vehicle for teachers. It can be used to untangle some of the complexity that occurs in the profession, to raise teachers’ voices in discussions of educational reform, and ultimately to transform assumptions about the teaching profession itself. As you will examine throughout this module, when teachers engage in an intentional study of their own classroom practice, it can have a profound influence on student learning and educational reform. This is because teachers are more likely to facilitate changes in their teaching based on knowledge they discover on their own. It is important to realize that there are several different types of research methods. It is possible to use quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods in your research project. The Mertler (2020) text provides an explanation for each and notes when it is appropriate to use each. As you are exploring the teaching testimonials and reading the study examples, identify the research method each is using. Then, try to determine why that particular research method is used. This will help you decide which research method you need to use when you begin your Action Research Project.

Order Now]

How do you currently involve traditional educational research in your work as an educator?

How might engagement in collaborative teacher inquiry/action research become a part of your current work as an educator?

What did you notice about the research methods used in the examples you read?

What role does research play in educational reform?

Does that role shift or change based on the use of traditional research versus action research?

To what degree does promoting positive social change play a role in educational research?

[Order Now]

MD1 A Different Kind of Research 6733

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.