MBA 635 Expectations of Society Research Paper

December 9, 2022

MBA 635 Expectations of Society Research Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

MBA 635 Expectations of Society Research Paper

[Order Now]

What should businesses expect from society?

How much power should be shared between business and other members of society?

Do businesses have too much power already to try and address larger societal issues?

Are businesses suited to solve larger societal problem?

At the end of each section of our course, you will write a topic paper that goes into additional detail. The three topics are:

Business, Society, and Stakeholders
Corporate Governance and Strategic Management
Business Ethics and Leadership

In your topic paper, you are expected to do additional research on the concept and/or the way in which companies are utilizing the ideas. For example, the concept of Greenwashing arises in the first section. In your topic paper, you could expand upon the material in the text by giving a history on when and why greenwashing began, examples of companies accused of greenwashing, outside groups who “police” greenwashing, and customer reactions to greenwashing campaigns.

There are any number of potential topics in each section – if you have questions or would like help talking through your ideas, please let me know.

The paper is 4-6 pages long, double spaced, standard margins and font. You will need at least 5 outside resources beyond the textbook, and 3 of these must be academic sources (journal articles). The paper should be written in the third person (i.e. no “I”, “me”, etc.)

Use APA formatting for in-text citations and a reference list. The organization of the paper should increase the clarity of the discussion – this can be achieved using a brief introduction and breaking down ideas into logical sections with a transition between each.

In order to better guide your analysis and writing, and to provide the best feedback, each topic paper will be assessed based upon the format below.

COMPONENT	Max. Point Total	Points Earned Draft/Final
CRITICAL THOUGHT & ANALYSIS · Defined a clear topic relevant to section · Identification of the key issues regarding the topic · Depth of analysis (i.e., delving beyond the obvious) · Thoroughness/depth of analysis · Clarity of examples given to support claims · Connection to other topics from class, where appropriate	45
SUPPORTING MATERIALS · Effective use of sources and facts to support and illustrate your arguments · Effective application of concepts from readings and in-class discussion to support and illustrate your arguments	20
WRITTEN PRESENTATION · Analysis and arguments presented in a cohesive/organized manner · Logical flow to the paper · Clarity in your writing (no awkward or unclear sentences) · Paper follows prescribed format including length	20
GRAMMAR/SPELLING/PUNCTUATION · Capitalization, spelling, punctuation · Personalization (do not use “I”, “me”, “my”, etc.) · Lack of proof-reading · Providing citations in the body, use of proper citation format after quoted materials and full references on reference page at end (i.e., Skaggs & McKelvey, 2011, p 5)	15
TOTAL POINTS EARNED	100

[Order Now]

MBA 635 Expectations of Society Research Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.