Mass Shootings And Serial Murder Sociology Questions

November 29, 2022

Mass Shootings And Serial Murder Sociology Questions

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Mass Shootings And Serial Murder Sociology Questions

[Order Now]

If you were hired by the governor to solve the state’s mass shootings problems, especially at schools, what would you do?

Mental illness is not an illness of choice. That is, no one chooses to have mental problems as much as no one chooses to have heart problems. Do you believe it is fair for people to implicate mental illness whenever mass shootings happens?

When it comes to mass shooting, which do you think should be our most concern, cold-blooded killers, jealous husbands and boyfriends or the mentally ill?

Allowing teachers and Professors to carry concealed weapons, at schools, is an option law makers are weighing, what are your thoughts on this matter?

People kill people with guns. Guns don’t kill people. Guns are simply objects of self-defense. What do you think about the statement?

Do you believe frequent mass shooting in our country is an excessive availability of guns in America or a “Second Amendment Rights” issue that allows individuals the right to own guns?

[Order Now]

Which race do you believe are most likely to commit most mass shootings and serial murder and why do you think so?

It has been said that, “….all we need to stop a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun.“ What do you think about this statement?

Do you believe we are using mental illness as scapegoat to avoid addressing gun issues in America?

Mass Shootings And Serial Murder Sociology Questions

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.