Martin Luther on Indulgence Questions

Martin Luther on Indulgence Questions

Order Number	9898uytr56
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Martin Luther on Indulgence Questions

Forwarded from the GEnie Religion & Ethics RT

Below is a link to an English translation of Martin Luther’s Ninety-Five Theses (originally written in Latin).

Please read only theses #5, #20-2Please read only theses #5, #20-28, #79-82, #86, #90 and answer the following discussion questions in no less than 200 words.

Source: Martin Luther, Ninety-Five Theses, 1517, Internet History Sourcebook

 

Discussion Questions:

1. Based on the assigned excerpts, what are Martin Luther’s arguments against the sale of indulgences?
2. In what ways does Martin Luther criticize clergy, especially preachers of indulgences?
3. In what ways does Martin Luther challenge papal authority and power?

Here are the 95 Theses Martin Luther nailed on the church door at Wittenburg.

This was posted a while back by David Becker in one of the Lutheran topics.

 

[Order Now]

 

1. When our Lord and Master Jesus Christ said, “Repent” (Mt 4:17), he willed

 the entire life of believers to be one of repentance.

 

2. This word cannot be understood as referring to the sacrament of penance,

 that is, confession and satisfaction, as administered by the clergy.

 

3. Yet it does not mean solely inner repentance; such inner repentance is

 worthless unless it produces various outward mortification of the flesh.

 

4. The penalty of sin remains as long as the hatred of self (that is, true

 inner repentance), namely till our entrance into the kingdom of heaven.

 

5. The pope neither desires nor is able to remit any penalties except those

 imposed by his own authority or that of the canons.

 

6. The pope cannot remit any guilt, except by declaring and showing that it

 has been remitted by God; or, to be sure, by remitting guilt in cases

reserved

 to his judgment.  If his right to grant remission in these cases were

 disregarded, the guilt would certainly remain unforgiven.

 

7. God remits guilt to no one unless at the same time he humbles him in all

 things and makes him submissive to the vicar, the priest.

 

8. The penitential canons are imposed only on the living, and, according to

 the canons themselves, nothing should be imposed on the dying.

 

9. Therefore the Holy Spirit through the pope is kind to us insofar as the

 pope in his decrees always makes exception of the article of death and of

 necessity.

[Order Now]

 

10. Those priests act ignorantly and wickedly who, in the case of the dying,

 reserve canonical penalties for purgatory.

 

11. Those tares of changing the canonical penalty to the penalty of purgatory

 were evidently sown while the bishops slept (Mt 13:25).

 

12. In former times canonical penalties were imposed, not after, but before

 absolution, as tests of true contrition.

 

13. The dying are freed by death from all penalties, are already dead as far

 as the canon laws are concerned, and have a right to be released from them.

 

14. Imperfect piety or love on the part of the dying person necessarily

 brings with it great fear; and the smaller the love, the greater the fear.

 

15. This fear or horror is sufficient in itself, to say nothing of other

 things, to constitute the penalty of purgatory, since it is very near to the

 horror of despair.

 

16. Hell, purgatory, and heaven seem to differ the same as despair, fear, and

 assurance of salvation.

 

17. It seems as though for the souls in purgatory fear should necessarily

 decrease and love increase.

 

18. Furthermore, it does not seem proved, either by reason or by Scripture,

 that souls in purgatory are outside the state of merit, that is, unable to

 grow in love.

 

19. Nor does it seem proved that souls in purgatory, at least not all of

 them, are certain and assured of their own salvation, even if we ourselves

may

 be entirely certain of it.

 

20. Therefore the pope, when he uses the words “plenary remission of all

 penalties,” does not actually mean “all penalties,” but only those imposed by

 himself.

 

21. Thus those indulgence preachers are in error who say that a man is

 absolved from every penalty and saved by papal indulgences.

 

22. As a matter of fact, the pope remits to souls in purgatory no penalty

 which, according to canon law, they should have paid in this life.

 

23. If remission of all penalties whatsoever could be granted to anyone at

 all, certainly it would be granted only to the most perfect, that is, to very

 few.

 

24. For this reason most people are necessarily deceived by that

 indiscriminate and high-sounding promise of release from penalty.

 

25. That power which the pope has in general over purgatory corresponds to

 the power which any bishop or curate has in a particular way in his own

 diocese and parish.

 

26. The pope does very well when he grants remission to souls in purgatory,

 not by the power of the keys, which he does not have, but by way of

 intercession for them.

 

27. They preach only human doctrines who say that as soon as the money clinks

 into the money chest, the soul flies out of purgatory.

 

28. It is certain that when money clinks in the money chest, greed and

 avarice can be increased; but when the church intercedes, the result is in

the

 hands of God alone.

 

29. Who knows whether all souls in purgatory wish to be redeemed, since we

 have exceptions in St. Severinus and St. Paschal, as related in a legend.

 

30. No one is sure of the integrity of his own contrition, much less of

 having received plenary remission.

 

31. The man who actually buys indulgences is as rare as he who is really

 penitent; indeed, he is exceedingly rare.

 

32. Those who believe that they can be certain of their salvation because

 they have indulgence letters will be eternally damned, together with their

 teachers.

 

33. Men must especially be on guard against those who say that the pope’s

 pardons are that inestimable gift of God by which man is reconciled to him.

 

34. For the graces of indulgences are concerned only with the penalties of

 sacramental satisfaction established by man.

 

35. They who teach that contrition is not necessary on the part of those who

 intend to buy souls out of purgatory or to buy confessional privileges preach

 unchristian doctrine.

 

36. Any truly repentant Christian has a right to full remission of penalty

 and guilt, even without indulgence letters.

 

37. Any true Christian, whether living or dead, participates in all the

 blessings of Christ and the church; and this is granted him by God, even

 without indulgence letters.

 

38. Nevertheless, papal remission and blessing are by no means to be

 disregarded, for they are, as I have said (Thesis 6), the proclamation of the

 divine remission.

 

39. It is very difficult, even for the most learned theologians, at one and

 the same time to commend to the people the bounty of indulgences and the need

 of true contrition.

 

40. A Christian who is truly contrite seeks and loves to pay penalties for

 his sins; the bounty of indulgences, however, relaxes penalties and causes

men

 to hate them — at least it furnishes occasion for hating them.

 

41. Papal indulgences must be preached with caution, lest people erroneously

 think that they are preferable to other good works of love.

 

42. Christians are to be taught that the pope does not intend that the buying

 of indulgences should in any way be compared with works of mercy.

 

43. Christians are to be taught that he who gives to the poor or lends to the

 needy does a better deed than he who buys indulgences.

 

44. Because love grows by works of love, man thereby becomes better. Man

 does not, however, become better by means of indulgences but is merely freed

 from penalties.

 

45. Christians are to be taught that he who sees a needy man and passes him

 by, yet gives his money for indulgences, does not buy papal indulgences but

 God’s wrath.

 

46. Christians are to be taught that, unless they have more than they need,

 they must reserve enough for their family needs and by no means squander it

on

 indulgences.

 

47. Christians are to be taught that they buying of indulgences is a matter

 of free choice, not commanded.

 

48. Christians are to be taught that the pope, in granting indulgences, needs

 and thus desires their devout prayer more than their money.

 

49. Christians are to be taught that papal indulgences are useful only if

 they do not put their trust in them, but very harmful if they lose their fear

 of God because of them.

 

50. Christians are to be taught that if the pope knew the exactions of the

 indulgence preachers, he would rather that the basilica of St. Peter were

 burned to ashes than built up with the skin, flesh, and bones of his sheep.

 

51. Christians are to be taught that the pope would and should wish to give

 of his own money, even though he had to sell the basilica of St. Peter, to

 many of those from whom certain hawkers of indulgences cajole money.

 

52. It is vain to trust in salvation by indulgence letters, even though the

 indulgence commissary, or even the pope, were to offer his soul as security.

 

53. They are the enemies of Christ and the pope who forbid altogether the

 preaching of the Word of God in some churches in order that indulgences may

be

 preached in others.

 

54. Injury is done to the Word of God when, in the same sermon, an equal or

 larger amount of time is devoted to indulgences than to the Word.

 

55. It is certainly the pope’s sentiment that if indulgences, which are a

 very insignificant thing, are celebrated with one bell, one procession, and

 one ceremony, then the gospel, which is the very greatest thing, should be

 preached with a hundred bells, a hundred processions, a hundred ceremonies.

 

56. The true treasures of the church, out of which the pope distributes

 indulgences, are not sufficiently discussed or known among the people of

 Christ.

 

57. That indulgences are not temporal treasures is certainly clear, for many

 indulgence sellers do not distribute them freely but only gather them.

 

58. Nor are they the merits of Christ and the saints, for, even without the

 pope, the latter always work grace for the inner man, and the cross, death,

 and hell for the outer man.

 

59. St. Lawrence said that the poor of the church were the treasures of the

 church, but he spoke according to the usage of the word in his own time.

 

60. Without want of consideration we say that the keys of the church, given

 by the merits of Christ, are that treasure.

 

61. For it is clear that the pope’s power is of itself sufficient for the

 remission of penalties and cases reserved by himself.

 

62. The true treasure of the church is the most holy gospel of the glory and

 grace of God.

 

63. But this treasure is naturally most odious, for it makes the first to be

 last (Mt. 20:16).

 

64. On the other hand, the treasure of indulgences is naturally most

 acceptable, for it makes the last to be first.

 

65. Therefore the treasures of the gospel are nets with which one formerly

 fished for men of wealth.

 

66. The treasures of indulgences are nets with which one now fishes for the

 wealth of men.

 

67. The indulgences which the demagogues acclaim as the greatest graces are

 actually, understood to be such only insofar as they promote gain.

 

68. They are nevertheless in truth the most insignificant graces when

 compared with the grace of God and the piety of the cross.

 

69. Bishops and curates are bound to admit the commissaries of papal

 indulgences with all reverence.

 

70. But they are much more bound to strain their eyes and ears lest these men

 preach their own dreams instead of what the pope has commissioned.

 

71. Let him who speaks against the truth concerning papal indulgences be

 anathema and accursed.

 

72. But let him who guards against the lust and license of the indulgence

 preachers be blessed.

 

73. Just as the pope justly thunders against those who by any means whatever

 contrive harm to the sale of indulgences.

 

74. Much more does he intend to thunder against those who use indulgences as

 a pretext to contrive harm to holy love and truth.

 

75. To consider papal indulgences so great that they could absolve a man even

 if he had done the impossible and had violated the mother of God is madness.

 

76. We say on the contrary that papal indulgences cannot remove the very

 least of venial sins as far as guilt is concerned.

 

77. To say that even St. Peter if he were now pope, could not grant greater

 graces are blasphemy against St. Peter and the pope.

 

78. We say on the contrary that even the present pope, or any pope

 whatsoever, has greater graces at his disposal, that is, the gospel,

spiritual

 powers, gifts of healing, etc., as it is written, 1 Co 12[:28].

 

79. To say that the cross emblazoned with the papal coat of arms, and set up

 by the indulgence preachers is equal in worth to the cross of Christ is

 blasphemy.

 

80. The bishops, curates, and theologians who permit such talk to be spread

 among the people will have to answer for this.

 

81. This unbridled preaching of indulgences makes it difficult even for

 learned men to rescue the reverence which is due the pope from slander or

from

 the shrewd questions of the laity.

 

82. Such as: “Why does not the pope empty purgatory for the sake of holy love

 and the dire need of the souls that are there if he redeems an infinite

number

 of souls for the sake of miserable money with which to build a church?  The

 former reason would be most just; the latter is most trivial.

 

83. Again, “Why are funeral and anniversary masses for the dead continued and

 why does he not return or permit the withdrawal of the endowments founded for

 them, since it is wrong to pray for the redeemed?”

 

84. Again, “What is this new piety of God and the pope that for a

 consideration of money they permit a man who is impious and their enemy to

buy

 out of purgatory the pious soul of a friend of God and do not rather, because

 of the need of that pious and beloved soul, free it for pure love’s sake?”

 

85. Again, “Why are the penitential canons, long since abrogated and dead in

 actual fact and through disuse, now satisfied by the granting of indulgences

 as though they were still alive and in force?”

 

86. Again, “Why does not the pope, whose wealth is today greater than the

 wealth of the richest Crassus, build this one basilica of St. Peter with his

 own money rather than with the money of poor believers?”

 

87. Again, “What does the pope remit or grant to those who by perfect

 contrition already has a right to full remission and blessings?”

 

88. Again, “What greater blessing could come to the church than if the pope

 were to bestow these remissions and blessings on every believer a hundred

 times a day, as he now does but once?”

 

89. “Since the pope seeks the salvation of souls rather than money by his

 indulgences, why does he suspend the indulgences and pardons previously

 granted when they have equal efficacy?”

 

90. To repress these very sharp arguments of the laity by force alone, and

 not to resolve them by giving reasons, is to expose the church and the pope

to

 the ridicule of their enemies and to make Christians unhappy.

 

91. If, therefore, indulgences were preached according to the spirit and

 intention of the pope, all these doubts would be readily resolved. Indeed,

 they would not exist.

 

92. Away, then, with all those prophets who say to the people of Christ,

 “Peace, peace,” and there is no peace! (Jeer 6:14)

 

93. Blessed be all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, “Cross,

 cross,” and there is no cross!

 

94. Christians should be exhorted to be diligent in following Christ, them

 Head, through penalties, death and hell.

 

95. And thus be confident of entering into heaven through many tribulations

 rather than through the false security of peace (Acts 14:22).

 

———-

 

Made available to the network by

Bob Van Clef <revc@GARG.CAMPBELL.CA.US>

 

Send email to

        fileserver@garg.campbell.ca.us

with the following text in the body of the message

        help

        dir.

to get information on the Roman Catholic Archive file server

 

Martin Luther on Indulgence Questions

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!