Marketing Strategies and Pricing Strategy Discussion

December 3, 2022

Marketing Strategies and Pricing Strategy Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Marketing Strategies and Pricing Strategy Discussion

[Order Now]

Marketing, Strategies, Pricing, Strategy, Discussion

Thus far we have developed a quality product and made it available to end users through an effective distribution system. Now it’s time to price the product.

Week 1 Discussion Post

Develop a pricing strategy for your chosen product/service.

Discuss what factors will impact your pricing strategy.

What pricing method would you use for your product/service and why?

These two questions require research using the textbook. No other resources are required. Citations and a reference list are required for this post.

This post should be 2 paragraphs in length (at least 100 words). Do not copy or quote. Since you are engaging in research, be sure to cite in the body of the post and add a reference list in APA format.

Week 2 Discussion Post

Corporate Social Responsibility has risen in popularity and stature in the last decade. Even small companies communicate ways that they give back to their communities.

Explain what product/service you are working with (this paragraph can be reused during class).

Share a viable socially responsible project that can be applied to your business. Explain why it would be a good fit for the culture of your organization and the community you serve.

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Marketing Strategies and Pricing Strategy Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.