Management Support System Presentation Assignment

December 16, 2022

Management Support System Presentation Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Management Support System Presentation Assignment

Management, Support, System, Presentation, Assignment

Assignment Content

You are a consultant that specializes in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP). You have been hired by a small start-up manufacturing company, with fewer than 500 hundred employees, that specializes in electronic devices. The CEO of the company would like to incorporate a management support system (MSS) into the organization to help in making business decisions.

This system will allow managers at the different levels to easily retrieve information from various databases in the organization to assist them in running scenarios, performing what-if analyses, and tracking organizational performance to determine goal achievement.

You’ve been asked by leadership to present an MSS to help Company ABC understand how to integrate an MSS into their organization and how it will help them gain a competitive advantage over other companies. Throughout this course, you will be completing different assignments that will apply to this company.

Research the different MSS processes currently used in business.

Create a chart that compares each MSS’s potential using Microsoft® Excel®.

Create a 10- to 12-slide, multimedia-rich presentation that includes the following:

A comparison chart

The features and benefits of using an MSS

What types of decisions the system will support

How the three levels of management will utilize the system and the value to each level

How the MSS supports establishing a competitive advantage

A recommendation would you make to the organization

Submit your assignment.

University of Phoenix Material

Grading Rubric for Week1 Individual Assignment: Management Support System Presentation

Content and Development Points Earned

All key elements of the assignment are covered in a substantive way.

The 2 key elements:

Create a chart that compares each MSS’s potential using Microsoft® Excel®. The chart can be incorporated into the presentation or submitted diseparate from the presentation.

Create a 10- to 12-slide, multimedia-rich presentation that includes the following:

Comparison chart
Features and benefits of using an MSS
What types of decisions will the system support
How the three levels of management will utilize the system and the value to each level
How the MSS supports establishing a competitive advantage
Recommendation would you make to the organization

Additional Comments:

The presentation structure should be organized in this fashion. You should have an introduction slide and a conclusion slide. The requirements for an Introduction and Conclusion are listed to the left.

The content is comprehensive, accurate, and informative. The presentation develops a central theme or idea, directed toward the appropriate audience. The presentation links theory to relevant examples and uses the vocabulary of the theory correctly.

Major points are stated clearly; are supported by specific details, examples, or analysis; and are organized logically. The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points. The conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper, and reviews the major points. Readability and Style Points Earned

Slide transitions are present, logical, and maintain the flow throughout the paper.

Additional Comments:

The tone is appropriate to the content and assignment. Bullets are complete, clear, and concise. Bullets are well constructed, with consistently strong, varied sentences. Slide transitions are present and maintain the flow of thought. Mechanics Points Earned

The presentation, including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page, is consistent with APA guidelines and meets course- level requirements.

Additional Comments:

Please make sure intellectual property is recognized by using a reference slide / in-text citations. Intellectual property is recognized with in-text

citations (use Notes area within the slides, if necessary) and a reference slide. The presentation is laid out with effective use of headings, font styles, and white space. Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed. Bullets are complete, clear, concise, and varied. Spelling is correct. Total Points Earned

Overall Comments:

[Order Now]

Management Support System Presentation Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.