Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
APA format. Always cite your sources. References list in alphabetical order. At least 300 words, include conclusion at the end. No plagiarism.
Submit a paper which is 3-4 pages in length (no more than 4-pages), exclusive of the reference page. Paper should be double-spaced in times new roman (or its equivalent) font which is no greater than 12 points in size. The paper should cite at least three sources in apa format. One source can be your textbook, if applicable.
Apa format. Always cite your sources. References list in alphabetical order. At least 300 words, include conclusion at the end. No plagiarism.
After reading the case “restoration affiliates,” reflect on the challenges of the organization. Build a value chain of the organization’s activities and identify the strongest and weakest link. Then, based on the information in the case, perform a swot analysis. Make sure that there are at least three strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats each.
Finally, based on your analysis of the value chain and swot, explain what is the most important strategic challenge or opportunity facing the firm and how it could be implemented.
Read the general guidelines for case studies and the case study rubric before beginning this paper.
Submit at least a 3-4-page case analysis, (independent of the title page and reference page) double-spaced in times new roman (or its equivalent) font which is no greater than 12 points in size. Paper and all citations should be in apa format.
At least 2 pages. Apa format. Cite your sources. No plagiarism.
This week we learned about the swot analysis. Reflect on how you might do a swot on your own abilities. For example, what internal personal strengths and weaknesses do you have? What external opportunities and threats are there for you?
For each strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat, can you find one which you discovered through your coursework thus far? After viewing the completed swot, what conclusions can you draw about your professional goals? Are they in alignment with the swot?
Apa format. Always cite your sources. References list in alphabetical order. At least 300 words, include conclusion at the end. No plagiarism.
Submit a 2-3 page paper, exclusive of the reference page and double-spaced. The paper should cite sources independent of the textbook.
Theorists from multiple disciplines have significantly contributed to the development of modern-day management attitudes and practices. Among those theorists include mayo, maslow, hertzberg, and mcgregor.
System.
Assessment criteria
Apa format. Always cite your sources. References list in alphabetical order. At least 300 words, include conclusion at the end. No plagiarism.
Read the article emotional intelligence predicts job performance: the 7 traits that help managers relate (http://www.forbes.com/sites/sebastianbailey/2015/03/05/emotional-intelligence-predicts-job-performance-the-7-traits-that-help-managers-relate/) and discuss the following topics:
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwrit