Macroeconomics article analysis

February 8, 2023

Macroeconomics article analysis

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Macroeconomics article analysis

Macroeconomics Article Analysis: 1. Pick a recent news article from a USNEWS or CNBC that contains content amenable to economic analysis in the US recently. (provide the article link) 2. In the first short paragraph you might outline the main points from the article that you are planning to analyze. You should identify the key macroeconomics issue(s) discussed in the article. Do not summarize the article. 3. Using the tools (including graphs) and terminology learned in macroeconomics explain the economics “behind” the article. Most news articles rarely, if ever, mention the terms or models we discuss in class even though economics is often very relevant to the article’s subject matter. The article simply describes something that is happening in the world. This is your opportunity to “think like an economist” to show how economic analysis can inform our understanding of the issue discussed in the article. If you can identify and discuss even one or two economic elements in a news story, then you may understand far more about the issue than most other readers, who only read the words as they are written on the page. 4. The analysis should be type written, although you can neatly hand draw any graphs that you might need for your analysis. 5. Carefully proofread for spelling and grammatical errors. Your paragraphs should be well-written.

[Order Now]

Macroeconomics article analysis

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.