macroeconomics

March 3, 2023

macroeconomics

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

macroeconomics

You are required to write two essays that should have a minimum of 1000 words and should not exceed 1500. The essays should be completed in .doc, .docx or .rtf format using MLA. The essays are not meant to be research papers. They are summary reports that link topics you have been learning in class to current economic news found in media articles. The basic idea of this exercise is to allow you to read, think and write on a topic of your choice while relating basic theory to real life.

Essay Topics- The broad general topic should be something involving Macroeconomics. You might wish to go through the table of contents or index of our textbook early in the course and identify a topic that interests you. For essay # 2 you can again focus on the broad topics of economic growth, unemployment, inflation, as well as on issues of fiscal policy, money, the financial system, savings, investment, monetary policy, and macroeconomic stabilization.

After you have selected a topic it might help to browse through media. Good sources for economic news include periodicals such as Businessweek, The Economist, Fortune, or others. Newspapers such as the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post, Christian Science Monitor are also good sources for current economic news articles.

Once you have identified a topic of interest, selected and read articles for review, and thought about how they are linked to the material learned in the class, you will write your report. It is suggested you follow the guidelines noted below when writing the essays.

Suggested Essay Format:

INTRODUCTION. The introduction states the reason(s) why your topic deserves consideration. In other words, why is your topic relevant and why is it of interest to the the public.

SUMMARY OF RESEARCHED ARTICLEs. Each article should be summarized separately. At the beginning of each summary, please state the author, the title, the source of the article, and the date it was published. Do not start a new page with each summary. Also, consider that the articles you select must have a common theme or topic. They can’t be randomly selected articles on Macroeconomics.

TEXTBOOK CONNECTION. Search through your textbook and obtain all information that relates to your topic. Show how the articles supported or contradicted information in your textbook.

EVALUATION AND CONCLUSION. In this section you should state assess the topic. How does this topic relate to your life now and in the future? How does this topic affect you or a particular business or industry?

[Order Now]

macroeconomics

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.