Logic and Reasoning Case Study Discussion

November 28, 2022

Logic and Reasoning Case Study Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Logic and Reasoning Case Study Discussion

[Order Now]

PART A

Explain whether you think the argument you have presented is a strong or weak argument giving specific reasons for your explanation.

Discuss whether your scenario is valid or invalid (formal), strong or weak (informal), and how you came to your conclusion.

Click the following link for the logic scenarios:
PHIL310 – Logic Scenarios.docx PHIL310 – Logic Scenarios.docx – Alternative Formats

PART B (will provide rubic)

This week is the final submission of your Portfolio Project. Make sure you incorporate instructor feedback, make any additional corrections, and submit your final paper to your ePortfolio

[Order Now]

PART C

In your own words, describe how understanding inductive reasoning can help you make a choice when certainty is not an option.

Explain how this understanding helped you, or could have helped you, make a better decision either personal or professionally.

PART A

Explain whether you think the argument you have presented is a strong or weak argument giving specific reasons for your explanation.

Discuss whether your scenario is valid or invalid (formal), strong or weak (informal), and how you came to your conclusion.

Click the following link for the logic scenarios:
PHIL310 – Logic Scenarios.docx PHIL310 – Logic Scenarios.docx – Alternative Formats

PART B (will provide rubic)

This week is the final submission of your Portfolio Project. Make sure you incorporate instructor feedback, make any additional corrections, and submit your final paper to your ePortfolio

[Order Now]

PART C

In your own words, describe how understanding inductive reasoning can help you make a choice when certainty is not an option.

Explain how this understanding helped you, or could have helped you, make a better decision either personal or professionally.

Logic and Reasoning Case Study Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.