life story paper

February 16, 2023

life story paper

Order Number	65776575356676357
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

life story paper

papers must be at least 5-6 pages of text. The paper should be in APA style. Your citations and references should include at minimum the theories indicated in the guidelines below. This means that you describe EACH theory indicated on the outline and cite EACH using APA style. This paper must include at least one book reference (outside of the textbook) and one journal article from the RCC library databases. YOU CANNOT QUOTE THE INFORMATION FROM THE BOOK OR OTHER SOURCES. You must discuss the theories in your own words. You must still include all the theories and concepts on the outline below but in the form of a term/review paper. Please include enough information to indicate that you fully understand the theory.

Stage 1: Newborn and Infancy Discuss your development of attachment using the four attachment patterns (p. 141). Include a brief of summary of EACH of the four attachment patterns and describe which pattern best describes your attachment pattern and why. Briefly describe EACH of the temperament types (pp. 146). How would you classify yourself and why?

Stage 2: Preschool Years Discuss Piaget’s preoperational stage of development (p 166). Include discussion of centration, conservation, and egocentric thinking. Use Piaget’s theory as a framework and describe your thinking and playing. Use Vygotsky’s social-cultural theory and describe your language and your schooling during this stage (p. 172). Include a brief summary of Vygotsky’s theory and how you language and schooling relate to his theory. Also include discussion of the zone of proximal development. Describe the formation of your gender identity (pp. 183). Do you remember when you realized you were a boy/girl? Which theory from the book do you think relates to how you learned about what was expected of you as a boy or girl? Discuss the theory you chose. Briefly discuss each of the child rearing styles (Baumrind, Maccoby & Martin, p. 188). Include a description of the style that best suits your parent(s) and why you chose that style. Relate you parent behaviors to the style you chose. Briefly discuss each of the views of moral development on pages 194-195.

Stage 3: Middle Childhood Refer to your resolution of Erikson’s stage of industry vs. inferiority. Include how Erikson describes this stage. Using Kohlberg’s moral development theory, at which level would you have characterized your level of moral reasoning at this age (p. 240)? What did you choose the level you did? (Briefly describe the level you chose and relate your behaviors/thinking to the level you chose.) If you are a female, you may want to refer to the work of Carol Gilligan. Describe family influences on your development (parent(s), siblings and/or other relevant family members, (p. 249) during this time. Do you think you would have turned out differently if your family life would have been different? Stage 4: Adolescence Describe how your experiences fit into Erikson’s theory of Identity vs. Identity confusion. Briefly describe the stage according to Erikson. Describe your adolescent identity status according to James Marcia’s theory (p. 288). Include a brief description of each status. Include the concepts of crisis and commitment. Describe and comment on the influence of your peer group (pp. 296-301). Were you popular? Were you part of a clique or crowd? Did you give in to peer pressure or did you try to pressure others? Did you experiment with drinking/smoking(including vaiping)/other drugs (p. 268)? What types of intervention occurred as a result (if any)? According to your text, what factors are associated with drug use for adolescents?

[Order Now]

life story paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.