Liability Claim and Potential Liabilities Unlawful Contract Termination

December 2, 2022

Liability Claim and Potential Liabilities Unlawful Contract Termination

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Liability Claim and Potential Liabilities Unlawful Contract Termination

[Order Now]

Relevant Information:

Marvin Manager, 56, works at Procom, Inc. Last year, he hired an outstanding employee, Sara Specialist. She has been in the industry since she was 25 and now at 41, has a 16-year track record of excellent results. Because of her experience and seniority, Marvin offered her a 2-year employment contract with a hefty salary, benefits, stock options and a termination clause which read as follows:

5(b) Termination for Cause: Procom may, at its option, terminate your employment immediately for cause, without prior written notice or compensation of any nature. For these purposes, “cause” means willful failure to perform substantially your duties with the company after receiving notice of a deficiency and failing to address it. 5(c) Termination without Cause: Notwithstanding the fixed Term of this Agreement, Procom may terminate your employment without cause upon 30 days’ written notice by providing you with liquidated damages equal to one year’s salary.

About one year after hiring Sara, Marvin and Sarah went to a business trip together to Florida. The hotel assigned them joining rooms with a connecting door. Marvin discovered that the air conditioning in his room did not work and asked Sarah if they could open the door between the two rooms to increase airflow. The two then went to dinner together where they proceeded to drink heavily.

Marvin and Sarah returned to the hotel and went into Sarah‘s room because it was cooler. Sarah invited Marvin to sit on the bed because there was no chairs. Sarah changed into her short nightgown and sat on the bed. Things progressed by the end of the evening, Marvin and Sarah had sex.

When the to return to the office, Marvin continue to ask Sarah to go out with him and to have dinner with him. He often referred to the night of passion and stated that he can wanted to continue a relationship with her.

Sarah did not want to engage in any further intimate relationship with Marvin and told him so. Nevertheless, his comments did not stop. Sarah never complain to human resources pursuant to company policy. She was embarrassed and felt she could just ignore Marvin until he eventually “got the picture”.

[Order Now]

Finally, when the behavior continued for several months, Sarah filed a complaint with the EEOC. Despite her excellent work Record, Marvin immediately fired her and replaced her with a 27-year-old female.

Question: What claims does Sarah have against her employer? What is Procom’s potential liability?

***Answer must be around 3 paragraphs or 450 words (give or take 30 words)***

Liability Claim and Potential Liabilities Unlawful Contract Termination

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.