Letter from The Birmingham Jail Martin Luther King Jr Essay
Description
Choose one argument and evaluate it according to these parameters:
Determine whether it seems to be a deductive or inductive argument, and why.
Determine whether the premises really support the conclusion: does the conclusion logically follow? Is the argument complete, or are there parts missing (for instance: missing evidence)? Is it valid (if deductive) or strong (if inductive)?
Determine whether you believe the premises are true, and why (what examples/experiences/knowledge do you have that supports them). Is it sound (if deductively valid) or cogent (if inductively strong)?
Determine whether there may be any bias in the argument, and whether such bias affects the persuasiveness of the argument.
Determine whether the argument is persuasive: is it convincing? Is there a counterargument or objection possible that might challenge this argument?
Please submit the file in Word or PDF format (if you use Google docs, Mac Pages, or some other word processing format, please Google search how to ‘Export As’ or ‘Save As’ one of the accepted filetypes).
Be sure to include proper formatting for an assignment (your name, the class, and the assignment name at the top) and title your evaluation using the argument you’ve chosen below to evaluate (e.g., “Evaluation of Socrates’ Argument that a Just Person Doesn’t Harm”).
The argument evaluation should address all 5 questions in at least 250-300 words and be cited properly (grounded in the text evaluated).
This is not an essay, and does not need to be in essay form; you may number your document 1-5 and simply answer each question below.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/